Sunday, December 03, 2006

Checks and Balances

We no longer need to wonder if an ethics complaint has been filed against Mike Nifong before the state bar. A Neff/Niolet/Blythe article in this morning’s N&O reveals that at least 17 complaints have been filed--made public not by the state bar, which legally cannot do so, but by the attorney general’s office, under public records requests. It’s my understanding that additional, and more comprehensive, complaints exist as well.

Moreover, one defense attorney, Michael Cornacchia, has urged federal intervention. He called on the U.S. Department of Justice to open an investigation, on the grounds that Nifong had violated the civil rights of the three players. Cornacchia, formerly chief investigative counsel for the probe of the United Nation’s oil-for-food program, is a legal heavyweight, and the justification for federal intervention, it seems to me, is overpowering.

As Neff notes, Nifong seems well aware of the threat: “In court, news releases and at news conferences, the prosecutor has responded to the criticisms against him, at times using language that sounds like an opening argument he might make to the State Bar in his defense.” Indeed, at this point the determination of the “minister of justice” to proceed has less to do with “justice” of the accuser’s “right” to a fair trial and more with a need to come up with some sort of justification for his actions that he can present to an ethics inquiry.

Two important quotes from the article. UNC law professor and former federal prosecutor Richard Myers: the defense calls for federal intervention are “a fairly strong indication the defense has nothing to hide if they want more eyes on the ground.”

North Carolina defense attorney Mary Ann Tally: “If they are complaints that have to do with what is going on right now and will continue to go on until this case is resolved, I guess the question I have is why isn’t the bar doing anything about it right now? It seems to me there’s a tremendous amount of pressure on the bar and a lot of public expectation on, ‘Can you do the right thing, and can you do it in a timely fashion?’”

Tally’s question is an excellent, and unanswerable, one.

77 comments:

GPrestonian said...

Thanks for the roundup, KC! Here's a Free Republic thread that has several recent articles in it. Most but perhaps not all are referenced or linked in your Sunday Roundup or Checks and Balances entries.

Anonymous said...

I was thrilled to read this article. Finally, something tangible to indicated someone besides us with direct authority is paying attention. Perhaps Cash Michaels and whoever else is telling us how irrelevant blogs, comments, and our views in general are will not have the last say. Thank you again for your excellent work, bloggers. I am sure your efforts will be very helpful to the NC Bar and the Feds. You have assembled a treasure trove of information for them.

Observer

RT said...

A poster (NC resident, I think) on Free Republic said that they couldn't decide what was more embarassing, Duke or the legal system in NC. I'm not sure that's a horse race upon which I'd like to bet. ;>)

Was it a G88 member who called DukeLAX a 'perfect storm' at the outset? They were right, but the 'perfect storm' appears to be one of cowardice on Duke's part and malfeasance on the legal system's part.

Anonymous said...

Is it possible that the NC State Bar is reluctant to come down hard on Nifong because of the possibility it would subsequently significantly help a plaintiff's case in the event of a financially damaging civil suit?

duke alum 05 said...

It should be noted that Cornacchia is one of Finnerty's attorneys.

Moreover, at least two others quoted in the article have connections to the Duke 3.

This article will most likely be spun by those who want to as an indication that money / power can buy justice.

Anonymous said...

Innocnent people have nothing to hide, and why would Nifong be afraid of a trial. So, he should simply let the evidence develop and not offer a response. In fact, given that there is strong interest in his conduct and it is dividing the community, a trial must be held.

sceptical said...

To 9:49

Trials are not held because of interest of the community or community divisions-- they are held to determine guilt or innocence of specific defendants on specific charges.

No one will win at a trial. The emotional and financial costs to the defendants are astronomical. The accuser will face a devastating cross-examination. Community divisions will be increased. A trial is a lose-lose proposition. Not all charges are brought to trial-- the DA is supposed to chose which cases merit charges based on evidence, not on political necessity. The charges should have been dropped long ago.

A second comment on the Neff et al. article. I don't like the subhead:

"Mike Nifong's detractors in the Duke lacrosse case want him punished for forcefully pursuing charges"

Nifong is being criticized for prosecutorial misconduct and not for "forcefully pursuing charges."

Anonymous said...

to: 10:05-- you are an idiot--i was kidding, using Nifong's statements about the Duke three to apply to the grievances. Sorry I did not telegraph the sarcasm for all levels

Michael said...

I'm assuming Mr. Nifong will not hire an attorney for any legal actions involving ethics complaints. After all, doing so would indicate that he is guilty, right?

GPrestonian said...

sceptical, good point on your correction of why Nifong's detractors are up in arms...

Nifong's pandering to the masses:

"I'm not going to allow Durham's view in the minds of the world to be a bunch of lacrosse players at Duke raping a black girl from Durham," Nifong said at a forum televised live April 12.

He should have added:

'Instead, I'll make sure that 'Durham's view in the minds of the world' will be that we're a town where the DA is politically motivated & the police are corrupt, and the denizens don't seem to care.'

sceptical said...

To 10:09:

The problem with your "sarcastic" post is that there are many people who actually hold such views, and have posted them on this and other forums.

I'll let others decide who is the "idiot." I have no desire to get into a personal discussion or debate.

Anonymous said...

The headline about forcefully pursuing charges indicates the split personality of the N&O and suggests that some editors there remain as Nifong enablers. Neff's work has been outstanding and some of Niolet's work has been, too. Wasn't Blythe's byline one of two on the inflammatory and fundamentally misleading March 24-25 coverage? And which of Sill's and Williams' editors wrote this headline?

bill anderson said...

By all means, if and when Michael Nifong appears before the Bar committee, he should appear alone, because no less an authority that Mr. Nifong himself has declared that innocent people don't need lawyers. (I acknowledge that numerous posters have said this, and I am copying them.)

Furthermore, I think it only appropriate that other attorneys laugh out loud whenever Nifong or one of his attorneys makes a statement. Sarcasm, braggadocio, belching, and the occasional passing of gas (done very loudly) need to be part of this proceeding. It seems only fitting, given Nifong's bizarre and disgusting courtroom behavior.

(Why judges put up with it further confirms the absolute corrupt nature of North Carolina courts, and declares that courts are nothing but playgrounds for prosecutors.) For that matter, I believe that a sign needs to be posted at the courtroom doors:

YOU ARE ENTERING A NORTH CAROLINA COURTROOM. ABANDON ALL HOPE, YE WHO ARE INNOCENT OF WRONGDOING.

A few pictures of the Little Rascals defendants, Darryl Hunt, and Alan Gell would be good decorations for this hell on earth.

Anonymous said...

to 10:29--just a lesson to read before you post. I was referring to the "grievances" and not the criminal trial. My point was that the whole idea of letting "trials" play out is always a good idea for other people. When it is your skin in the game, raise every delay and technicality you can, as Nifong will almost certainly do.

Anonymous said...

Easy Now!

I believe 10:09 was talking about when the state takes Nifong to task for his misbehavior. 10:09 was sarcastically saying that since the community was divided on Nifong's behavior---Nifong had to go to trial for his misdeeds.
Big Dog

Anonymous said...

given that this is supposed to be an intellectual site, think it's a good idea to focus on the macro issues: prosecu misconduct, punishing false reporters, problems with bar association, fecklessness of the feds

doofuses, please put up your hand if you think this case has any chance of making it to trial...

the writing is on the wall: both nifong and precious are in big trouble

Anonymous said...

To Bill Anderson at 1059

I disagree with your facetious comment that Nifong will not need an attorney since he is innocent. Nifong knows he is in big trouble if there is any credible invetigation of his (mis)conduct.

DJG

Anonymous said...

11:31

Go back and have a second cup of coffee!

wts said...

The Third Estate has failed and will continue to fail without the Fourth Estate continuing to point it out.....the Fourth Estate being the only Check or Balance here.

bill anderson said...

Two things. First, I was being facetious, but the Great Michael Nifong Himself is the Grand Authority who has declared that innocent people don't need attorneys. Since he seems to have a number of supporters who write comments on these pages, I figure that the Great Master of Justice needs to follow his own ex cathedera statements.

Second, the Fourth Estate, which is made up of mainstream news organizations, generally has failed. Most journalists have government officials and politicians as their main sources, so they usually are mouthpieces for the government or at least for someone who receives a government paycheck. Editorially, I rarely read a newspaper that does not endorse even more power to the state, mostly through regulatory agencies.

Thus, I declare the blogs to be the Fifth Estate. K.C. and company are helping to lead a new and important movement.

That last comment is NOT facetious! Future prosecutors who break the law are going to be on notice that the Internet is a most powerful tool for dispensing sunlight and disinfectant.

Anonymous said...

Does anyone else think the headline on the N&O story was biased in favor of Nifong?

Anonymous said...

"most journalists have gov officials and politicians as their main sources"?--Bill Anderson

billie boy, you've got to be kidding me--as mr natural used to say, "get the right tool for the right job": journalists use everyone from pimps to Nobel laureates for sources: depends on which story they are investigating--r u thinking of "confidential sources"?--same rule applies there

Question: if the accuses were black, AV white: would the bar and feds already have stepped in?--oh, that was a rhetorical question

fyi: ex cathedra is correct spelling

Anonymous said...

Nifong is a lowlife, but not an idiot.

He knows where the 'edge of the law' is and despite his abuse of it he won't get more than wrist slap from the legal system - an institution incented to protect its own.

Only caveat is if an DA Office 'insider' provides incriminating evidence of Nifong's corrupt motives.

That's all there is hope for - perhaps ADA A. Cannon cares to clear her conscience !

Anonymous said...

Remember the old expression, "what goes around comes around". I suspect Nifong is a bit uncomfortable as the heat is turned up as he is the target of an ongoing investigation.

Anonymous said...

nifong is indeed not an idiot, he's just an average lawyer, which of corse makes him an intellectual lightweight

he's made HUGE mistakes: the lineup and talks to the media will result in federal sanctions, civil lawsuits and disbarment

in a way, nifong is a lot like the prostitute: present-oriented, which is how criminologists euphemistically characterize the cognitively challenged

Anonymous said...

Bill,
I completely agree, the blogs and the Internet are the new 5th Estate. It is a momentous shift in authority. I have been an avid reader of the NYT and the WSJ for many years. Their abysmal coverage of this important case has completely changed my views on the value of newspapers. The blogs offer much greater transparency and flexibility. Incorrect material can be pointed out and alternate interpretations and nuances can surface almost immediately. Duff Wilson's Aug. 25 piece in the NYT permanently altered my relationship with that newspaper. Now, instead of racing for the newspaper in the morning, I log on for my news. I suppose I will continue to subscribe to my newspapers, but I will read everything while wondering what lies they are propagating and why. Some might say I was long overdue for this sort of revelation.

Observer

Anonymous said...

Observer, Duff Wilson, who is black, cowrote that piece. why focus on his name?

i've been trying to find out if precious is fat and homely, to no avail--so these blogs don't have as much transparence as u may think

bill anderson said...

"Billie Boy" used to be a newspaper reporter, and he had much contact with journalists across the country. And the journalists with whom I have spoken in writing on the Duke case have agreed with me wholeheartedly. One of them agreed that the use of government sources can be very problematic.

The main sources in this story, other than one with the AV, have been Nifong and the police. The lawyers long ago were gagged.

Yes, journalists interview others, but government sources are pretty much the main pool.

Anonymous said...

1 thing that troubles me about this case is the silence of the unindicted lacrosse players--this may be a legal thing, dunno

Anonymous said...

Duff Wilson is not black.
http://www.anderson.ucla.edu/x5565.xml

Anonymous said...

1:09,
I mentioned Duff Wilson because I did not remember the name of the co-author, and I did not want to look it up. My apologies to the co-author. I did not know Duff Wilson was black. As for the AV's appearance, I would assume she is reasonably attractive--seems like a job requirement for a stripper/escort. The pictures of her from the phone camera are blurry. I do not know how her appearance one way or the other would add much to the volumes of exculpatory evidence. I suppose you will be able to make a judgment on her appearance when the trial starts.

Observer

Anonymous said...

wilson is a light-skinned african american, which probably means he's 80% "black"

Anonymous said...

Care to provide any links supporting that idea?

bill anderson said...

To 1:33 PM:

Indeed, the issue IS a legal one. Nifong threatened to indict everyone who was at the party as an accessory to rape, which was one reason the players got lawyers. The unindicted players all have supported the Duke 3 via signed affadavits, but they still labor under Nifong's threats.

Also, the players are likely to be defense witnesses if there is a trial, and if Nifong indicts any of them, that will make it more difficult, obviously. Also, no doubt Nifong would hold a "testify against the Duke 3 and you will walk" deal over their heads, so the players have decided to stay quiet.

Now, Glenn Nick has said some public things on these threads, but even he has to watch what he says. Therefore, the "silence" is not a lack of support, but rather a cautionary move. Given Nifong's procilivities to indict on lies and the potential jury pool in Durham, one can see why the players are not banging their own sets of pots.

Also, the public statements by Brodhead of "whatever they did was bad enough" also have tempered any attempts of the unindicted players to speak out. Remember, they were viciously attacked by faculty members, other students, Nifong, the police, and the Duke administration. One cannot blame them for being quiet until the right moment arises.

Anonymous said...

thanks, bill

re duff: Google Images "Duff Wilson": the 2d 1 looks like he's def black

however, i could be wrong: the reason i thought he was black is because he's a lousy reporter and worse writer, but has all these awards--again, i could be wrong, but i won't be calling him to ask either

Anonymous said...

I agree that the silence of the unindicted lacrosse players is puzzling, especially since Nifong has said that he does not intend to seek charges against anyone other than the three indicted players. I suspect they are worried that if they issue some kind of statement, they will come under pressure to answer questions from the press about what happened at the party, and they do not want to put themselves in the awkward position of having to answer those questions and have their faces plastered all over the media in connection with this story. Better to maintain a low profile.

WEGL said...

duke alum 05 said...
This article will most likely be spun by those who want to as an indication that money / power can buy justice.
9:37 AM

You are correct that such attempts will be made but neither Money nor Power can buy justice.

Sadly, it is taking Money/Power to insure Justice is not denied. The system is supposed to protect the rights of the accused. The free press is supposed to shine a light into dark corrupt places. The leaders of our nation's institutions are supposed to take to their bully pulpit to challenge mediocrity & mendacity. All of those have failed.

What a sad picture this entire episode paints.

Anonymous said...

which is why integration doesn't work

as i've pointed out elsewhere, if the accused were black and AV white, the case would go bye-bye

Anonymous said...

3:05,
It would be foolish for unindicted LAX players to rely on Mr. Nifong's statements that he does not intend to seek charges against the other players. He could reconsider his position on that at any time. But it would be interesting to hear what they have to say.

Anonymous said...

In response to some comments posted above, it seems to me that it would not be proper for the Bar Association to intervene in a pending criminal case, even if there are indications of prosecutorial misconduct. I would think that the proper procedure would be to let the proceedings play out, presumably with the result that the court dismisses the charges for lack of evidence or the jury returns a verdict of not guilty, at which point, the Bar Association would begin an ethics investigation. This may be painful for the players, but it seems to me that if the Bar Association jumps in before the normal procedures are allowed to play out, the effect would be that the Bar Association is usurping the authority of the court and the jury to resolve the indictments handed down by the Grand Jury, which I think would be improper. Perhaps KC or a knowledgeable member of the audience could enlighten us as to whether any Bar Association has ever intervened in any criminal case in this country prior to the conclusion of the proceedings.

Anonymous said...

good point, methinks the feds should be the first to arrive

think of the case this way:

a surgeon (nifong) has operated on 3 people, maiming them

how to stop the incompetent from maiming others?

bring in the feds: their civil rights have definitely been violated!

Anonymous said...

But the feds won't arrive because blacks have more rights than whites in present-day America. Above poster was right: whites have to make too many accommodations to blacks, and this case is a prime example

Anonymous said...

I am not sure that the Department of Justice can jump in here either because under our system of federalism, the federal government is supposed to defer to the states on matters of state law, which would include allegations of rape. Although I am not an expert on civil rights law, I can see that after conclusion of the state criminal proceedings, DOJ might be able to prosecute Nifong for violation of the civil rights laws, though I think that would be a difficult prosecution because district attorneys are given a lot of discretion in handling their duties, not the discretion to violate civil rights, but still a lot of discretion. I would think that the only way for the players to vindicate their rights is by following the normal criminal procedure of trial and appeal, and presumably at some point either the trial court or an appellate court will make proper rulings on the constitutional issues. After those proceedings are concluded, DOJ or more likely the state bar association would have their shot at Nifong.

Anonymous said...

the lineup issue is too flagrant: i don't think the states have that much leeway

guarantee it that DOJ lawyers are licking their chops waiting to get a smackdown going in nifong's direction--the racial aspect is what's keeping them at bay--agreed?

Anonymous said...

It seems to me that "prosecutorial misconduct" is a charge that can only be made if a defendant is wrongly convicted as a result of the prosecutor's willful mistakes. If so, the NC Bar might not be able to intercede unless a verdict (of "guilty") is reached. There are other ethical violations on which the DA could be charged, but in general DA's have wide prosecutorial immunity--which protects them from being charged every time a defendant is found "not guilty." There are only a few very specific things that the DA can actually be charged with--making extrajudicial statements that he knows are false and that prejudice the community is one of the things that qualify--but I believe the defendant still has to be wrongly convicted (i.e., convicted and then, on appeal, have the conviction overturned because of the errors of the prosecutor) in order to file charges. Maybe an attorney can comment???

Anonymous said...

One other thing re: prosecutorial misconduct--by appointing himself the lead investigator, Nifong may have put himself in a more vulnerable position with respect to misconduct, enjoy a lower level of immunity.

Anonymous said...

In 4:34 above i meant to say "investigators enjoy a lower level of immunity" (than do prosecutors.)

KC Johnson said...

The 3.28 raises an interesting point--an issue (when and under what conditions have Bar Associations in the past traditionally intervened) I'll try to explore in a future post.

There is one most unusual item here, however. The bar's responsibility, as the Neff article looks out, is not to punish Nifong or aid the players but to safeguard the public.

Information has been brought to the attention of the bar that Nifong might have violated the ethics code. Can the bar, ethically, allow the issue to remain univestigated while Nifong prosecutes other cases--where he could, theoretically, break the rules again?

As long as this was the only case Nifong was prosecuting, this issue was moot. But, as we know, another high-profile case came along (the quadruple murder) and the "minister of justice" took over that case, too. That decision, it seems to me, increases the pressure on the bar to act.

Anonymous said...

sure, the extrajudicial rant was blatant, but isn't the more serious charge the stacked lineup?

christ, this could be a Three Stooges routine--it smacks of gross misconduct, something that must be addressed immediately

Anonymous said...

To 4:47 PM,

I would think this should be addressed not through any action by DOJ or by the state bar but rather through a pretrial motion by the defense attorneys to exclude the photo identification from evidence on the ground that it violated constitutional guidelines. As I understand it, if the photo identification is excluded from evidence, the AV also will not be allowed to identify the three defendants in court (because it is obvious that the three young men sitting at the defense table are the three she identified in the photo lineup), at which point the case would collapse.

WJD said...

How about a little humor on the site:
Subject: Durham County Court Ruling!!

A Durham County Court ruled there cannot be a nativity scene in Durham County this Christmas. This isn't for any religious or constitutional reason. They simply have not been able to find three wise men and a virgin in Durham County.
However, there was no problem finding enough asses to fill the stable

Anonymous said...

brilliant analysis: i hope you're right

Anonymous said...

I posted this weeks ago, the Bar will act, after they get back from the Wake Victory. BEFORE Christmas, Dat's what I've been told. Who knows, but I REALLY want to say I told you so. Merry Christmas Kempermanx

KC Johnson said...

I very much hope the 5.58 is correct.

On the Nifong procedural violations, I agree completely with 4.47(a)--the public comments are the most well-known Nifong violation (and they're a clearcut violation), but instructing police to violate their own procedures is the most serious.

On 4.47(b): ethics complaints and pretrial motions are separate avenues. For instance, it's theoretically possible (though highly unlikely) that Nifong could be found guilty of ethics violations, but victorious in pretrial motions. The first interprets his actions according to the ethics code of the state bar; the second according to relevant state and federal law.

Sceptical said...

I think there is a lot of wishful thinking going on here. The feds are not going to intervene in a state matter, even with alleged civil rights violations. The spineless NC Bar will likely give Nifong some sort of reprimand or short suspension, at most. The Gell case is instructive in this regard. North Carolina does not have any strong checks on rogue prosecutors except their defeat at the ballot box, and Nifong avoided that fate thanks to a split opposition.

Anonymous said...

6:23: you're forgetting 1 thing:

the white boys at DOJ are gonna want to whack him, because there already is extensive pressure to pursue this: the publicity will be nifong's undoing

Anonymous said...

The misconduct and criminal behavior of Nifong and DPD has to be egregious and must fall into certain categories before the Department of Justice and the FBI step in. Nifong and the DPD have crossed that line long ago. They have been compiling information for months. I believe the FEDs stepped in to intervene with Louisiana DA Jim Garrison who used the same tactics Nifong has used whose prosecutorial misconduct Nifong has actually topped. I believe the Supreme court will set a precedent with this Duke case.
Nifongs motives were purely political and self evident. Bring on the FEDS
21. See Shaw v. Garrison, 467 F.2d 113, 119-21 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1024, 93 S.Ct. 467, 34 L.Ed.2d 317 (1972), aff'g, 328 F.Supp. 390, 393-400 (1971). In Shaw, we detailed then District Attorney Jim Garrison's harassing prosecution of Clay Shaw and the bad faith tactics Garrison employed in his zealous investigation of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. Shaw represents perhaps the paradigm in this Circuit of impermissible prosecutorial motives. Garrison used his prosecution of Shaw as a means of procuring public support--financial and otherwise--of his larger investigation into the assassination of the President. See Shaw v. Garrison, 328 F.Supp. at 393-400.

bill anderson said...

Call me a skeptic, but I just do not see the feds intervening in this one, nor do I see the North Carolina Bar doing anything, either. Remember, this case is being driven by political entities, not just Nifong.

We have the feminists, racialists, and other elements of political correctness, and these people tend to be concentrated in academe, journalism, and law. I suspect that many attorneys in North Carolina, given their PC proclivities, are fully in agreement with Nifong and DON'T CARE if there really was a rape or not. They just want a trial and conviction.

So, someone needs to prove to me that the NC Bar actually is going to stand up for three wealthy white males. As for the feds, since when has the DOJ done anything that is useful? Its prosecutions tend to follow the political winds, and there is no political upside for the feds to go after Nifong.

Again, I would love to stand corrected on both counts. But, if the NC Bar was willing to take a powder for David Hoke and Debra Graves after what they did, I cannot see the Bar doing anything about a politically-charged rape case.

GPrestonian said...

Bill:

Further proof that the AV had help picking out the perps - none of the fathers of the accused work for Hailliburton! Otherwise Dubya & Cheney would have the Feds all over Nifong like ducks on a June bug!

Koinkydinky? I think not!! ;>)

...and there is no political upside for the feds to go after Nifong

GPrestonian said...

Speaking of balance, which we all need to maintain, right?

There's a funny poetry thread going at LieStoppers - A Poetic Downward Spiral, Nantucket Sleighride, Anyone?

Anonymous said...

Here is a link to a depressing law review article on prosecutorial misconduct by Peter J. Henning--www.law.wustl.edu/wulr/77-3/773-713.pdf. It's entitled "Prosecutorial Misconduct and Constitutional Remedies." Most of the article dwells on how difficult it is to have a prosecutor held accountable in any way for misconduct. And then you get to this juicy nugget, "After Hollywood Motor Car, the only instance in which prosecutorial misconduct that violates due process should result in dismissal of an indictment and a bar on further proceedings before trial is when, but for the prosecutorial misconduct there would have been no probable cause to charge the defendant. In that circumstance the real problem is the insuffiency of the evidence; prosecutorial misconduct is secondary to the lack of credible evidence to charge the defendant." 77 Wash.U.L.Q.713(1999)p.824. Another article by the same author should be interesting too. It is called "Prosecutorial Misconduct in Grand Jury Investigations," 51 S.C.L.Rev1(1999). I have not found it online, yet, but it's probably here somewhere. I believe the risk of bar sanctions for Mr. Nifong are very real--unless the NC Bar is corrupt. And if the Feds or the Bar or a court does not address this situation pre-trial, this will be the case that inspired serious reform...I hope.

Observer

Anonymous said...

And I know the standard for probable cause is very low, but the accusations of a witness who is not credible coupled with lots of powerfully exculpatory evidence surely does not meet even the very low threshold for probable cause. I do not believe that Mr. Nifong can ignore the overwhelming evidence that the AV is lying and proceed with this case--at least not legally...which brings up the idea of a criminal prosecution for Mr. Nifong. Peter Henning makes it clear in his article that criminal prosecution of the prosecutor is one of very few possible remedies available for prosecutorial misconduct.

Observer

Anonymous said...

"there is no political upside for the feds to intervene"?

white people still run this country, and some of them, like myself, are gonna want blood, u know, the blood of fat 100 iq feckless lawyers

nifong very well may go to prison

ATTORNEYS: Is it possible to prosecute precious at this stage, or does the trial need to be resolved first?

Anonymous said...

11;25: funny post

I for 1 would love to see our precious honor student do a perp walk

would love to see what R Crumb would do with precious

i'd love to venture some scenarios, but then this post would be deleted

Anonymous said...

12:53 You have expressed my thinking about newpapers - I believe this is true of many people and part the decline of newpapers. I had no idea Duff Wilson is black, but sadly his view and coverage of the case now makes more sense.

duke09parent said...

I think 3:28 is right. The NC Bar will only act, if at all, once the case is over. While I have not researched the issue, I have not heard of the Virginia bar intervening in an ongoing case in my 28 years in practice in that state.

I also do not see the DOJ doing anything unless there is a conviction. They will let the state procedure play out and only if there is a corrupted conviction will they intervene. Even then it might take a federal habeous corpus petition to be filed, post conviction and post appeal, in order for the DOJ to enter even as amicus. I seem to recall that federal habeous corpus relief is not available until the state rememdies have been unsuccessfully exhausted. But again, criminal law and appeals is not my field.

Anonymous said...

A habeas challenge can occur only after a conviction has been finalized (appeal all the way up the state system and cert denied by the US supreme court). It's possible for an amicus brief at any point on appeal, but hopefully it won't get to that point. If the DoJ were to file charges (civil rights abuses) against Nifong, they would file charges outside of any criminal appeals taken from the case. There's also the possibility that the players could file charges under section 1983 against the city of Durham. Given the flagrant abuses noted here, it seems likely that they would prevail.

Anonymous said...

the emphasis is on the checks not the balances as this is just another attempt to buy justice. it will probably suceed, too.

GPrestonian said...

7:14 Anon:

The very existence & number of ethics complaints, and the obvious & well-documented improprieties and shortcuts by the DA & DPD, as well as the lack of a real investigation, would seem to argue against your hypothesis.

Are we to understand that you disagree?

the emphasis is on the checks not the balances as this is just another attempt to buy justice....

Anonymous said...

To 7:14,
It is actually unlikely this case will be dismissed before trial. We are in almost completely uncharted territory. But if ever a case deserved to be dismissed before trial, this is it. And because this case is so outrageous, there is a chance we will break new ground here. That possibility should be welcomed by anyone who holds constitutional protections dear and hates prosecutorial abuses. If Mr. Nifong is brought up short in this case, the precedent will work to the benefit of all, especially, as James Coleman pointed out, those most likely to experience prosecutorial malfeasance, poor minorities. Be thankful someone can afford to pay highly competent lawyers to do this important job. We will all reap the benefits!

Observer

Anonymous said...

As far as Federal intervention: don't underestimate the power of political connections these families of the falsely accused have, don't underestimate the power of the relatives of the falsely accused who will not stop and will take this directly to the Senate, Congress and Whitehouse using their connections, calling in favors to see these young mens lives are put back in place and their names are cleared....no matter how long it takes or how much money it costs. We will not allow Nifong to get away with this unscathed. We will see he is punished to the full extent of the law.

Anonymous said...

We sell a wide range of products. Nokia , Motorola , Samsung , Sony Ericsson , Nextel , Siemens s. Digital Cameras , Nikon Camera, Canon Camera. Games , Xbox 360 , NIntendo , Play Station 2 , Sony PSP's , GBA. PDA.Pocket pc Tomtom Go 700 , Tomtom Go 600 and Tomtom Go 500 Ipods Nano , Ipod Mini , Ipod Shuffle. Laptops/Notebook. If you are indeed interested and ready to order pls contact us on the information below. Email: bob_p2@yahoo.com / p2gareth001@gmail.com .

NOKIA LIST:

NOKIA N70-- $140
NOKIA N71--$160
NOKIA N72--$170
NOKIA N80-- $170
NOKIA N90-- $180
NOKIA N91-- $190
NOKIA N92-- $200
NOKIA N93-- $300
NOKIA N95-- $350
NOKIA 8800-- $150
NOKIA 8801--$160
NOKIA 9300--$140
NOKIA 9500--$160


NEXTEL LIST:

NEXTEL i830 -- $120
NEXTEL i860 -- $130
NEXTEL i930 -- $110
NEXTEL i860 -- $100
NEXTEL 1930 -- $120
NEXTEL i870 -- $140
NEXTEL i450 -- $90
NEXTEL 1860 -- $110

APPLE IPOD NANO PRICE LIST:
Apple 2 GB iPod Nano--$50
Apple 4 GB iPod Nano--$60
Apple 30 GB iPod Video--$110
Apple 60 GB iPod Video--$150
Apple 80 GB IPod Video--$180
Apple 40 GB iPod photo--$40
Apple 60 GB iPod photo--$55
Apple 30 GB iPod Photo M9829LL/A--$50
Apple iPod nano Media Player 2GB--$100
Apple iPod nano Media Player 4GB--$150
Apple iPod nano Media Player 6GB--$200
Apple 60 GB iPod Photo M9830LL/A--$60
Apple 4 GB iPod Mini Blue M9436LL/A--$45
Apple 4 GB iPod Mini Pink M9435LL/A--$40
Apple 512 MB iPod Shuffle MP3 Player--$40
Apple 4 GB iPod Mini Silver M9160LL/A-$40



I-MATE LIST:

I-MATE SP5-- $150
I-MATE SP5m--$155
I-MATE SP4m--$120
I-MATE JAM-- $160
I-MATE PDA2--$190
I-MATE SP3i--$130
I-MATE SP3-- $135
I-MATE PDA2k-$168
I-MATE JAMin--$240
I-MATE JASJAR-$280
I-MATE K-JAM--$180
I-MATE Pocket PC--$140
I-MATE JAM Black--$150
I-MATE Smartflip--$140
I-MATE Smartphone2--$110
I-MATE Smartphone-- $115

PALM TREO'S LIST.

PALM TREO 700WX-- $230
PALM TREO 700X--- $220
PALM TREO 700P--- $210
PALM TREO 700---- $200
PALM TREO 650---- $170
PALM TREO 600---- $150


MOTOROLA LIST:

MOTOROLA V300--$100
MOTOROLA V400--$115
MOTOROLA L7--- $160
MOTOROLA L6-- $150
MOTOROLA V51-- $90
MOTOROLA V50-- $80
MOTOROLA V70-- $100
MOTOROLA V60-- $95
MOTOROLA V600--$120
MOTOROLA V3 RAZ-- $160
MOTOROLA MPX 300--$180
MOTOROLA MPX 220--$120
MOTOROLA MPX 300--$160


02 PHONES LIST:

O2 X2i--$120
02 X4-- $130
02 X3-- $120
02 x7-- $140
02 xDA Exec--$280
02 XDA Atom--$260
02 XDA NEO-- $265
02 XDA IIi-- $180
02 XDA IIs-- $185
02 XDA mini S-- $270
02 XDA II mini--$200

SAMSUNG LIST:

SAMSUNG S105--$50
SAMSUNG D800--$185
SAMSUNG D500--$160
SAMSUNG SGH D720-- $170
SAMSUNG SGH-T200-- $110
SAMSUNG SGH-D900-- $200
SAMSUNG SGH-T500-- $100
SAMSUNG SGH-S307-- $110
SAMSUNG SGH-N620-- $59
SAMSUNG SGH-A800-- $69
SAMSUNG SCH i830-- $220
SAMSUNG MM-1940 -- $190

SONY ERICSSON LIST:

SONY ERICSSON T600-- $100
SONY ERICSSON P800-- $180
SONY ERICSSON P900---$200
SONY ERICSSON P980i--$200
SONY ERICSSON P990-- $210
SONY ERICSSON W800i--$140
SONY ERICSSON W900i--$220
SONY ERICSSON S700i--$125

SIDEKICK PHONE LIST.

SIDEKICK III-- $150
SIDEKICK II -- $100
JUICY COUTURE SIDEKICK II-- $130
SIDEKICK II MISTER CARTOON--$130

PLASTATIONS VIDEO GAMES LIST:

GARMIN 396--$150
SONY PLAYSTATION 1 -- $120
SONY PLAYSTATION 2 -- $130
SONY PLAYSTATION 3 -- $170
SONY PSP VALUE PACK -- $95

XBOX GAMES LIST:

Xbox 360 Core System -- $163
Xbox 360 Prenium pack --$190
Xbox 360 Platinum Bundle Console -- $155
Intec G8600 Xbox 360 9.2 TFT Screen--$85 .

Nintendo Wii Console -- $160

QTEK SMARTPHONE LIST:

Qtek 8500--$130
Qtek S200--$180
Qtek 9000--$250
Qtek 8310--$200
Qtek 8300--$185
Qtek 9100--$270
Qtek 8100--$150
Qtek S110--$175
Qtek S100--$190
Qtek 9090--$200
Qtek 8020--$190
Qtek 8010--$140
Qtek 2020i-$220
Qtek 2020--$200
Qtek 1010--$140
Qtek S200--$200

We look forward to your Prompt Reply .......SERIOUS AND LEGIT BUYERS NEEDED.

Do contact us direct by Email: bob_p2@yahoo.com / p2gareth001@gmail.com .

Anonymous said...

BUSINESS PROPOSAL LETTER.
We have all brands of Mobile Phones,Ipods,Sidekicks,Nextels phone,Laptops for sell at cheap and
affordable prices, they ranges from Nokia/Samsung/LG/Sony
Ericsson/Motorola/Alcatel/panasonic With Bluetooth, all
Brands and Models of Nextel Phones, we want you to get back
to us with your quote so that we can begin a good business
relationship. Note they are all Brand New T2 Euro specs,
unlocked, no operator logo, come in their
original sealed box, With 1 year international warranty
from the manufacturer, English & Spanish manual, Finland
made.
We want to assure you that you will never regret buying
from us because the delivery will be to your doorstep via
FedEx Courier service.And the Tracking number shall be sent
to you upon acknowledgement of your payment.
Kindly acknowledge the reciept of our mail and get back to
us at bestofmobiles@hotmail.com


WE ARE SELLING LOTS OF MOBILE PHONES FOR VERY CHEAP PRICE AND THESE PHONES ARE THE LATEST PHONES ALSO THEY SELLS A LOT IN MARTEK SO THEY ARE AS FOLLOW'''''''''''''

WE ARE CURRENTLY RUNING A PROMOTION OF BUY 5 AND GET 1 FREE.

FOR SELL MOTOROLA RAZOR V3 MOBILE PHONE AT JUST $140usd,

FOR SELL MOTOROLA RAZOR V3x MOBILE PHONE AT JUST $150usd

FOR SELL NEXTEL i930 MOBILE PHONE AT JUST $120usd,

FOR SELL NEXTEL i860 MOBILE PHONE AT JUST $100usd,

FOR SELL SONY ERICSSON P910i MOBILE PHONE AT JUST $150usd,

FOR SELL SONY ERICSSON W800i MOBILE PHONE AT JUST $140usd

FOR SELL MOTOROLA MPX 220 MOBILE PHONE AT JUST $130usd,

FOR SELL MOTOROLA MPX 300 MOBILE PHONE AT JUST $140usd,

FOR SELL SONY ERICSSON S700i MOBILE PHONE AT JUST $120usd

FOR SELL NOKIA 9500 MOBILE PHONE AT JUST $160usd,

FOR SELL NOKIA 9300 MOBILE PHONE AT JUST $130usd,

FOR SELL SAMSUNG D500 MOBILE PHONE AT JUST $150usd,

FOR SELL SAMSUNG D500 MOBILE PHONE AT JUST $170usd

FOR SELL SIDEKICK II MOBILE PHONE AT JUST $100usd

FOR SELL SIDEKICK III MOBILE PHONE AT JUST $120usd

FOR SELL NOKIA N71 MOBILE PHONE AT JUST $150USD

FOR SELL NOKIA N80 MOBILE PHONE AT JUST $150USD

FOR SELL NOKIA N93 MOBILE PHONE AT JUST $200USD

FOR SELL NOKIA N92 MOBILE PHONE AT JUST $175USD

FOR SELL NOKIA N70 MOBILE PHONE AT JUST $150usd

FOR SELL NOKIA N90 MOBILE PHONE AT JUST $170usd

FOR SELL NOKIA N91 MOBILE PHONE AT JUST $170usd

FOR SELL NOKIA 8800 MOBILE PHONE AT JUST $150usd

Contact us birect by e mail bestofmobiles@hotmail.com

Apple 4 GB iPod Mini Pink M9435LL/A ......40 USD

Apple 40 GB iPod photo....................40 USD

Apple 4 GB iPod Mini Silver M9160LL/A ....40 USD

Apple 60 GB iPod Photo M9830LL/A..........60 USD

Apple 60 GB iPod photo ...................55 USD

Apple 30 GB iPod Photo M9829LL/A..........50 USD

Apple 512 MB iPod Shuffle MP3 Player......40 USD

Apple 4 GB iPod Mini Blue M9436LL/A.......45 USD

Apple 2 GB iPod Nano......................50 USD

Apple 4 GB iPod Nano......................60 USD

Apple 30 GB iPod Vidoe...................110 USD

Apple 60 GB iPod Vidoe...................150 USD

X box premium console .................. 190usd

Ps2 .........................................160usd

Contact us birect by e mail bestofmobiles@hotmail.com

Anonymous said...

CAUTION!!!

BOB MICHEAL (bob_p2@yahoo.com) IS A FRAUDULENT PERSON.

IF YOU ARE THINKING TO NEGOTIATE WITH HIM, YOU WILL LOSE YOUR MONEY.
I HAD NEGOTIATED TO BUY A NOKIA SIROCCO TO HIM, I MADE THE MONEY TRANSFER, 2 DAYS LATER SAID TO ME THAT IT HAD SENT 4 NOKIA, AND IT REQUESTED TO ME THAT IT MADE ANOTHER MONEY TRANSFER BY 800 ADDITIONAL EUROS. OBVIOUSLY I DID NOT ACCEPT. I ONLY SOLICITED TO HIM 1 UNITY.
I ASK FOR THE RETURN OF MY MONEY, HE REFUSED TO GIVE BACK THE MONEY. IT SAID THAT THE SHIPMENT HAD LEFT GREECE, AND THAT THE SHIPMENT HAD BEEN STOPPED IN FLORIDA.. THE FINAL DESTINY WAS MEXICO.
THEY HAVE SPENT 2 MONTHS And I HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANYTHING.
I HOPE TO AVOID THAT MORE PEOPLE AS I FALL IN A BOB FRAUD.

bob_p2@yahoo.com
p2gareth001@gmail.com
darell_com@yahoo.com
darellcomm@gmail.com

They are the same fraudulent person.

IF BOB REFUND ME THE MONEY, I WILL RETRACT AND WILL NOTIFY TO FORUM.

ivory said...

LINK 64 MOBEIL PHONS STORES
NEW GSM PHONES/PDA - UNBEATABLE PRICES WE ARE CERTIFIED WHOLESALERS OF
VARIOUS GSM MOBILE PHONES AT VERY AFFORDABLE PRICES ATTACH IS OUR VERY
CURRENT PRICE LIST OF GSM PHONES FOR YOUR REFERENCE ALL PHONES/PDA ARE
BRAND NEW SIM FREE/OPEN LINES/UNLOCK.
We are mobile phones wholesalers and we do sale in pieces to enhance
our sales.We deals on all brands and models of mobile phones such as
Nokia,Motorola,Samsung,Sony Ericsson,Sagem, Nextel,Sidekick
II,Sprint,Ipods, Laptops, Mp3 players etc at very cheap prices.Also, this is to reach
our customers globally that its the season of BUY TWO GET ONE FREE.
We are using
this medium to reach interested buyers of mobile phones.Do kindly reply
back if you are interested. THE KINDS OF MOBILE PHONES ARE LISTED BELOW:
Email address...link45_mobilestores@hotmail.com
Email address...link45_mobilestores@yahoo.com
PRICE LIST BELOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Brand Playstation and XBox Game
PLASTATIONS:

Ninten do Wii-----------------------------$160
GARMIN 396-----------------------------$150
Playstation 1-----------------------------$120
Playstation 2-----------------------------$130
Playstation 3-----------------------------$180
Sony PSP Value Pack---------------------$105
XBOX GAMES:
Xbox 360 Core System ------------------- $163
Xbox 360 Prenium pack ------------------$190
Xbox 360 Platinum Bundle Console ----- $155
Intec G8600 Xbox 360 9.2 TFT Screen--$85

SIDE KICK S

D-WADE SIDE KICK 3 FOR JUST...........$180USD
SIDE KICK 1 FOR JSUT...............$100USD
SIDE KICK 2 FOR JUST ..............$130USD
SIDE KICK 3 FOR JUST...............$180USD
LRG SIDE KICK 3 FOR JUST...........$160USD
PINK COUTURE SIDKEICK 3---------$120USD
MR CARTOO SIDKEICK .................£110USD

Noka N Series:

Nokia N95--- $250
Nokia N70--- $170
Nokia N71--- $170
Nokia N72--- $170
Nokia N73--- $170
Nokia N80--- $180
Nokia N90--- $170
Nokia N91--- $180
Nokia N92--- $200
Nokia N93--- $210
Nokia 8800 --- $200 sirocco
Nokia N-Gage--- $175
Nokia N-Gage QD--- $180
cNokia 6680-----------$160
Nokia 6060-----------$240
Nokia 6111------------$200

Motorola A388C......170 USD
Motorola A760.......250 USD
Motorola A768.......260 USD
Motorola A768i......200 USD
Motorola A780.......290 USD
Motorola C550.......90 USD
Motorola C650.......100 USD
Motorola E365.......100 USD
Motorola E398.......120 USD
Motorola E680.......240 USD
Motorola RAZR V3....270 USD
Motorola V220.......170 USD
Motorola V303.......100 USD
Motorola V400.......150 USD
Motorola V500.......150 USD
Motorola V501.......200 USD
Motorola V525.......150 USD
Motorola V600 (OEM) w/ Bluetooth Headset..260 USD
Motorola V600 OEM...180 USD
Motorola V690.....170 USD
Motorola V750.....180 USD
Motorola V80......200 USD
Motorola V80 with Bluetooth...260 USD
Motorola V872.....200 USD
Motorola V878....180 USD
Motorola V300....150 USD

Samsung D600...260 USD
Samsung D500...240 USD
Samsung E600...140 USD
Samsung E800...180 USD
Samsung P510...120 USD
Samsung SGH-D410.200 USD
Samsung SGH-D500..270 USD
Samsung SGH-E700..150 USD
Samsung SGH-E715..170 USD
Samsung SGH-P100..130 USD
Samsung SGH-P400..95 USD
Samsung SGH-P408..240 USD
Samsung SGH-P730..150 USD
Samsung SGH-S200..90 USD
Samsung SGH-S300..70 USD
Samsung SGH-S300M..100 USD

Sony Ericsson W910--US260
Sony Ericsson W900--US250
Sony Ericsson W810i--US200
Sony Ericsson W800i--US200
Sony Ericsson P800-- US$155
Sony Ericsson P900-- US$205
Sony Ericsson P910i-- US$210
Sony Ericsson T20e-- US$35
Sony Ericsson T20s-- US$39
Sony Ericsson T28s-- US$39
Sony Ericsson T28 World-- US$45
Sony Ericsson T29s-- US$49
Sony Ericsson T100-- US$30
Sony Ericsson T105-- US$35
Sony Ericsson T200-- US$45
Sony Ericsson T230-- US$55
Sony Ericsson T300-- US$55
Sony Ericsson T310-- US$50
Sony Ericsson T600-- US$69

Sony CMD-J5-- US$30
Sony CMD-Z7-- US$35
Sony CMD-J7-- US$40
Sony CMD-J6-- US$40
Sony CMD-Z5-- US$90
Sony CMD-MZ5-- US$155
Sony Ericsson R520m-- US$100
Sony Ericsson R380 World-- US$90
Sony Ericsson R380s-- US$105
Sony Ericsson R600-- US$35
Sony Ericsson S700-- US$175
Sony Ericsson K500i-- US$180
Sony Ericsson K700i-- US$189

Siemens A35-- US$15
Siemens A40-- US$19
Siemens A50-- US$25
Siemens A52-- US$29
Siemens A55-- US$30
Siemens C45-- US$30
Siemens C55-- US$35
Siemens CL50-- US$70
Siemens CL55-- US$65
Siemens CT56-- US$30
Siemens M50-- US$35
Siemens M55-- US$120
Siemens MC60-- US$79
Siemens ME45-- US$50
Siemens S45-- US$60
Siemens SL42-- US$65
Siemens SL45i-- US$69
Siemens S55-- US$85
Siemens SL55-- US$125

Nextel i55sr-- US$65
Nextel i2000plus-- US$35
Nextel i58sr-- US$30
Nextel i530-- US$35
Nextel i205-- US$20
Nextel i305-- US$25
Nextel i35s-- US$29
Nextel i88-- US$30
Nextel i90-- US$59
Nextel i95cl-- US$70
Nextel i60c-- US$40
Nextel 6510TM-- US$110
Nextel i730-- US$85
Nextel i733-- US$95
Nextel i736-- US$105
Nextel i830-- US$115
Nextel i860-- US$125
Nextel i930-- US$140

ALCATEL One Touch 501-- US$39
ALCATEL One Touch 311-- US$35
ALCATEL One Touch 511-- US$49
PANASONIC GD67-- US$49
PANASONIC GD92-- US$69
PANASONIC GD90-- US$69
SENDO X2 MUSIC PHONE:----------$96
HTC FARADAY-2100/2125:--------$300
SANYO MM-7500:-------------------$180
LG VX-8100---------------------------$215
PALMONE UNLOCKS TREO 650:---$140
TREO 650:-----------------------------$170
TREO 600:----------------------------$170
PALM TREO 650:---------------------$200

Pda’s
Hp ipaq pocket pc h4150 ========= $190
Asus my pal a716 ================= $175
Hp ipaq pocket pc h4350 ========= $185
Toshiba pocket pc e405 ========== $120
Sony clie peg-th55 ============== $155
Toshiba pocket pc e800 ========== $220
Palm one zire 72================== $120
Palm one tungsten e ============== $90
Palm one tungsten c ============== $140
Palm one zire 31 ================= $65
Palm trio 650=====================$240

IPODS
Apple 4 GB ipod mini blue m9802ll/a---------------us$64.00
Apple 4 GB ipod mini pink m9804ll/a'-----------------us$64.00
Apple 4 GB ipod mini green m9806ll/a--------------us$64.00
Apple 6 GB ipod mini blue m9803ll/a'----------------us$68.00
Apple 6 GB ipod mini silver m9801ll/a-------------------us$68.00
Apple 20 GB ipod m9282ll/a--------------------------us$69.00
Apple 4 GB ipod mini pink m9435ll/a-----------------us$49.00
Apple 40 GB ipod photo------------------------------us$49.00
Apple 4 GB ipod nano----------------------------------us$69.00
Apple 2 GB ipod nano-------------------------------------'us$62.00
Apple 4 GB ipod mini silver m9160ll/a-------------------us$49.00
Apple 60 GB ipod photo m9830ll/a--------------------us$86.00
Apple 60 GB ipod photo---------------------------------'us$49.00
Apple 30 GB ipod photo m9829ll/a'-------------------us$73.00
New apple 60 GB video ipod--------------------------us$140.00
New apple 30 GB video ipod--------------------------us$120.00

PRICELIST FOR QTEK PHONES :
Qtek 8100 Tri-Band Camera Music Unlocked GSM Phone White.....$125
QTEK 8300 GSM MOBILE SMARTPHONE.....$145
Qtek 8310 Unlocked Quadband GSM Phone....$165
Qtek 8500 Unlocked SmartPhone.....$155
Qtek 8600 Unlocked GSM SmartPhone....$225
Qtek 9000 3G Pocket PC Unlocked GSM Phone.....$320
Qtek 9100 Smartphone / Pocket PC Unlocked GSM Phone....$190
Qtek 9600 Unlocked GSM SmartPhone.....$280
Qtek G100 GPS PPC and Pharos Ostia GPS Software(US Maps)....$175
QTEK S200 GSM/GPRS Pocket PC Unlocked Quadband Phone.....$185

I-Mate JAM 128MB Unlocked....$180
I-Mate JAMin Unlocked....$200
I-Mate JASJAR Unlocked....$290
I-Mate K-Jam Unlocked....$200
I-Mate Smartflip Unlocked....$190
I-Mate SP5 Unlocked....$130
I-Mate SP5m Unlocked....$120
BlackBerry 8800 $180
Blackberry 8700v $170
Blackberry 8700r $165
Blackberry 8700g $160
Blackberry 8700c $155
Blackberry 8707g $150
Blackberry 8703e $145
Blackberry 8705g $140

We offer prompt shipping from our Warehouse factory,Typically the product will arrive within 2/3 Days Via Either Fedex/Ups Courier Sevices.
NOTE: Shipping Charges are Base On Destination,So when Placing Order with Us Kindly Include your Location Such as State and Zipcode
SO GET BACK TO US IF YOU QRE INTRESTD IN ANY OF OUR PRODUCT VIA ANY OF YOUR EMAIL BELOW
Email address...link45_mobilestores@hotmail.com
Email address...link45_mobilestores@yahoo.com
Thanks and god bless you

Anonymous said...

ELECTRONICS TRADING INC.
EMail :Electronicstrade312@NETZERO.NET

We have alot of mobile phones and Ipods in
stock,they are all brandnew,the
phones are unlocked/with complete accessories.

We are on a Bonanza,If you order for 2 mobile
phone,you will get 1 mobile
phone for free & if you order for 5units of mobile
phone youwill have 2 free
mobile phone and free shipping.

Nokia 8800 $170
Nokia N70 $160
Nokia N71 $165
Nokia N72 $180
Nokia N90 $185
Nokia N91 $200
Nokia N92 $220
Nokia E70 $220
Nokia E60 $200
Nokia E61 $200
Nokia E90 FOR $260USD
Nokia N95 FOR $300USD
Nokia N93 FOR $220USD
Nokia N76 FOR $250USD
Nokia N75 FOR $240USD
Nokia N83 FOR $200USD
Nokia N82 FOR $185USD
Nokia N81 FOR $170USD
Nokia N80 FOR $160USD
Nokia N73 FOR $200usd
Nokia 8800 sirocco $240

Motorola Razor v3x $145
Motorola V3i $140
Motorola A1010 $110
Motorola A1000 $100
Motorola Rock1 $120
Motorola W220 $160
Motorola Q for Verizon……$200
Motorola Mpx 220 $122
Motorola Mpx 300 $130

Nextel i930 $120
Nextel i870 $110
Nextel i860 $100
Nextel i850 $90

Palm Treo 650 $140
Palm Treo 700p $170
Treo 750.......$200

Samsung U300 $190usd
Samsung U600 $200usd
Samsung U700 $250usd
Samsung Z540 $250usd

Qtek 8100 $105
QTEK 8300 $125
Qtek 8310 $135
Qtek 8500 $145
Qtek 8600 $200
Qtek 9600 $240
Blackberry 8800 $220

Sony Ericsson p990.....$180
Sony Ericsson p910i....$160
Sony Ericsson w900i....$155
Sony Ericsson K750i....$140
Sony Ericsson k800i....$150
Sony Ericcson W850i....$170
Sony Ericsson k700i....$130
Sony Ericsson W800i....$155
Sony Ericsson W900 ....$160
sony Ericsson w600i....$140

-Mate JAM 128MB $200
I-Mate JAM $180
I-Mate JAMin $200
I-Mate JASJAR Quadband $300
I-Mate K-Jam QuadBand $200
I-Mate Smartflip QB. $200
I-Mate SP5 $140
TomTom Mobile 5 $220
TomTom GO GPS Car Navigation System $280
TomTom Navigator 5 Bluetooth GPS $270
TomTom Mobile GPS for Smartphones $260

Apple ipod 80gb video $150
Apple Ipod 60Gb video $120
Apple Ipod 30Gb video $100
Apple Ipod nano 4Gb $70

SIDEKICK 2 $120
SIDEKICK 3 $150
Lrg Sidekick 3 $160

Sony PSP Giga Pack ............$80usd
Sony PSP Value Pack............$90usd
Nintendo wii Console...........$150usd
Playstation 3 (20 GB)..........$ 220usd
Playstation 3 (60 GB)..........$ 250usd

SONY PLASMA TV

SONY FWD-42PV1 Plasma Display $500
Sony PFM-42X1 Plasma Display $550
Sony FWD-50PX2 Plasma Display $700

Contact Details

Name :Mr Anthony Felix

EMail :Electronicstrade312@NETZERO.NET

WE PROVIDE A GOOD AND FAST SERVICES, OUR SHIPPMENT
IS WITHIN 48HRS
THANKS,
REGARD,
MANAGEMENT.

Anonymous said...

Hey, while searching for widgets for my blog, I stumbled upon www.widgetmate.com and wow! I found what I wanted. A cool news widget. My blog is now showing latest news with title, description and images. Took just few minutes to add. Awesome!