Saturday, April 21, 2007

Cartoon

A good cartoon from today's Charlotte Observer.

31 comments:

Anonymous said...

Don't forget, K.C., Karla Holloway wrote that "white innocence means black guilt." Thus, in the mind of one of the "celebrated" members of the Duke faculty, the three still are guilty.

Anonymous said...

Baloney. If anything Holaway was so on target somebody should give her the award for best prediction of the garbage that would preoccupy this blog. Here's the full quote people. You haters point out where she was wrong if you can (that is, those of you who don't wander around trying to take things out of context to make your points):

"In nearly every social context that emerged following the team's crude conduct innocence and guilt have been assessed through a metric of race and gender. White innocence means black guilt. Men's innocence means women's guilt. These capacisou categories which were in absolute play during the night of the team's drunken debacle, CONTINUE THEIR HOLD ON THE CAMPUS AND THE DURHAM COMMUNITY."

so...those of you who can read know nearly every point on this blog continues to prove her right.

If you don't like this, stop making these associations between race and a person's likely beliefs. But frankly, it is way too late for that now.

Anonymous said...

I can' wait for the charges of racism and anti-semitism to surface with respect to that cartoon.

After all, it seems like a stereotypical Jewish face the the cartoonist has used.

Anything to divert attention away from the missteps of the PC crowd and direct it back to the most important agenda.

Anonymous said...

Bill Anderson
Actually,in this case, Karla Holloway is right,"white male innocence means black female guilt!"

3 innocent white male lax players=1 guilty lying black female accuser.

Anonymous said...


If you don't like this, stop making these associations between race and a person's likely beliefs. But frankly, it is way too late for that now.


Wow, Anon. You nailed that one:


Because they were white jocks they must have raped her


Or was it:


Because they were drinking alcohol their normal black-women-raping intentions just naturally surfaced and they went out and grabbed two black women so they could degrade them.


I think you have clearly identified the stereotypes being applied from the beginning.

Anonymous said...

What a dumb statement anyway, "white innocence means black guilt." That's like "tails I win, heads you lose." It goes without saying that if there are two sides (one black and one white)and white wins, of course black will lose. duh!

Words of wisdom: Sometimes...
black innocence means black guilt
black innocence means white guilt
black guilt means white innocence
black guilt means black innocence
black liar means white innocence
white innocence means black liar
black liar means white innocence
white innocence means black liar

Anonymous said...

My Gosh-
Karla Holloway was right! The white men in this case are innocent and the black woman in this case is guilty!

Anonymous said...

Sorry, Bill, just read your comment. Obviously, I agree!

Anonymous said...

cartoon was PC

cartoonist knows that a stupid black professor coined the phrase, yet it's Nifong in the cartoon

Polanski

Anonymous said...

I didn't know Nifong was Jewish.

Anonymous said...

He's not - the name is German, Swedish - something like that. Are we going to get an Elders of Zion essai?

Anonymous said...

Where's the mole on the forehead? It's like a piece of spinach in someone's teeth: you can't stop your eyes from going to it....gross.

Anonymous said...

Mole? I thought it was the Eye of Cyclops.

Anonymous said...

I like the post about Holloway being "so on target." She was claiming that the three were rapists, and even if they were proved innocent, they still were rapists.

If anyone insisted on defining the entire incident through the "matrix" of race, it was Holloway and her friends.

Anonymous said...

Oh, I guess just the artist thinks he is Jewish - you know - the nose, the horns. By the way, I am Jewish but don't happen to have large nose. Horns, though, just won't go away.

Anonymous said...

I posted this on a previous thread, but since the topic of guilt is being teased here, I will repost the link:

More obfuscation and excuses

Debrah

Anonymous said...

TO 3:08PM--

Nifong certainly isn't Jewish!

The cartoonist was merely caricaturing the reality of the creep.

Nifong has a hawk-like nose with a wart on his forehead.

Also.....very crooked and bad teeth.....with slits for lips.

Why don't people in the public arena do more about their appearance?

It's an endless mystery.

Debrah

Gary Packwood said...

Suckling off the Duke Endowment

Anonymous 1:15 said...

...White innocence means black guilt. Men's innocence means women's guilt. These capacious categories which were in absolute play during the night of the team's drunken debacle, CONTINUE THEIR HOLD ON THE CAMPUS AND THE DURHAM COMMUNITY."
::
We have heard this before starting back in the late 1960's but not from university based professors who seeks to poison their students.

Nesting at universities is a fairly new phenomenon for the far left.

Most of the old time radicals created their own organizations to provide financial support in collaboration with churches. Also, there were no Lie Stoppers, FODU or Durham in Wonderland back in those days. Not even the pre-electronic versions.

If the Anger Professors wish support, they should form their own organizations and pass the hat.

They will have a hard time with churches this time, however. Small churches caught on to their game many years ago and see the far left as money sucking monsters.

Still other churches now days have become megachurches with their own agenda of somehow paying the mortgage, TV time and light bill.

What to do with the far left as they CONTINUE THEIR HOLD ON THE CAMPUS AND THE DURHAM COMMUNITY?

Suggestions?

They sure enjoy suckling off the Duke endowment!
::
GP

Anonymous said...

Carolyn says:

Anonymous at 1:15: Honey, don't make a fool of yourself - that's OUR job.

In that spirit, I therefore point out that you not only did not give the right defense of "Holaway", you didn't even give the right spelling. Ironically, though, you did give the right assessment. From the beginning, Holloway HAS judged this case solely on the basis of race and gender.

Which is why she (and you) can not stand us. We judged it on the basis of truth.

Anonymous said...

Stop feeding the trolls.

Anonymous said...

Jewish? Horns? Hawk-like nose? Wha???

Guys, the cartoon is showing Nifong as the Duke Blue Devil, i.e., the mascot of the school. Hasn't anyone seen it before? Do a GIS for "Duke Blue Devil."

Anonymous said...

As the cartoon suggests, if Nifong really truly believed Crystal was raped that night, and the 3 Duke Lax players are innocent, then who and where are the rapists?

Anonymous said...

Look's like a C on side of devil mask. To bad it wasn't done in that faded blue color to show the poultry excretion looks he now exhibits.

Anonymous said...

Ha, this is how you know the defenders of the hoax have no argument left...their blogs have started to run dry so they come over here. Good luck with that!

Anonymous said...

ssezqsqswsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss

Anonymous said...

ssezqsqswsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss

Anonymous said...

Check out the Editors' Blog at the N@O Web site. Lots of interesting comments under editor Sill's commentary. Read the response from Walter Abbott of Ruston, La.

Anonymous said...

The NY Times is saying they were not bais in the Duke case. The reported made a mistake giving more worth to notes made up from memory months later over the notes taken while talking to the FA.

No really
/

Anonymous said...

The NY Times is saying they were not bais in the Duke case. The reported made a mistake giving more worth to notes made up from memory months later over the notes taken while talking to the FA.

No really
/

Anonymous said...

8:50
Well, DUH!!!!!!

Anonymous said...

Kimberly,
No, nobody noticed that. Is this your first trip on the short bus?