tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post6782536982872664569..comments2024-02-24T05:19:10.949-05:00Comments on Durham-in-Wonderland: Cohan, Steel, and Argument by Insinuationkcjohnson9http://www.blogger.com/profile/09625813296986996867noreply@blogger.comBlogger32125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-8205331958473418292014-10-05T03:42:49.667-04:002014-10-05T03:42:49.667-04:00Maybe someone paid you NOT to read Cohan's boo...Maybe someone paid you NOT to read Cohan's book.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-33875616918364033342014-04-10T23:36:41.142-04:002014-04-10T23:36:41.142-04:00.
Important Guidance
. . . D o . . N O T . .....<br /><i>Important Guidance</i><br /><br /><b> . . . D o . . N O T . . F e e d . . the . . T r o l l s </b>A Duke Dadnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-3072493670393325482014-04-10T23:35:32.372-04:002014-04-10T23:35:32.372-04:00As I see it, Cohan is just another Progressive who...As I see it, Cohan is just another Progressive who didn't like how the criminal case ended. Most mainstream journalists, as I see it, wanted the story to be true and were sorely disappointed when it was only too good to be true. (Or, too BAD to be true)<br /><br />What is telling to me, and something I am emphasizing in an upcoming article, is that Cohan's assertions are pretty easily taken apart. That anyone would believe anything Nifong says is, well, unbelievable, given that the man is a psychopath and pathological liar. Anyone who watched Nifong at the bar trial or in the contempt hearing can see that he is missing a few screws, along with a conscience.<br /><br />That other journalists are fawning all over this piece of garbage is more evidence that Progressive Mainstream journalists are not people interested in the truth. They are interested in pursuing and promoting a political agenda, and everything else is secondary.William L. Andersonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01802990642236807359noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-45333631736876966922014-04-10T22:42:57.267-04:002014-04-10T22:42:57.267-04:00So do you think this might indicate an aspect of p...So do you think this might indicate an aspect of people who have graduated from or work at Duke, that they can't put new information into perspective or context in general, or is it just something you noticed about Cohan's own personal critical thinking skills or lack thereof?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-10232014361755358352014-04-10T22:32:43.674-04:002014-04-10T22:32:43.674-04:00In parts of the book I have read, Cohan does not u...In parts of the book I have read, Cohan does not use critical thinking, whether its an interview with Nifong or new quotes from the SAER. He does not put new information into perspective or context. scepticalnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-54518929753145798002014-04-10T22:30:11.357-04:002014-04-10T22:30:11.357-04:00To the 10:14,
You're wrong.To the 10:14,<br />You're wrong.guiowenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11904401455585682885noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-12534304565410159902014-04-10T22:14:13.677-04:002014-04-10T22:14:13.677-04:00Sure Lance, you can take it that way since you did...Sure Lance, you can take it that way since you did, but it doesn't mean anything about the book specifically since i am in no hurry to do a lot of other things as well as i stated. It is more about my non interest in reading or watching about the subject matter since my knowledge of the event is first hand from a NC citizen spectator perspective as i also stated. Why do you need that explained to you Lance? Does it not fit your agenda? What is your agenda? <br /><br />The worse part is if anyone disagrees or questions what some of ya'll insist to be that which only ya'll deem can be believed or thought or the 'truth' about that case you bash immediately or pretend the thought or belief or perspective is either stupid or the person stating it is a moron and your enemy (because they think differently from you). Why do you do that? It doesn't make your views any more believable or credible just because you attack like bullies and beat on people if they don't believe you. Now that IS stupid since there are plenty of people in this world with views differing than your own. Are you going to beat up on everyone until no one believes anything you profess out of natural instinct? KC can't even acknowledge his obsession with the case without getting trollee about it. How does he expect to be able to debate Nifong directly on this blog if he can't take one single question about his own obsession with the case and whether it affects his commentary or not? Get real. sheeessshhhhAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-74610747790515177582014-04-10T19:22:00.074-04:002014-04-10T19:22:00.074-04:00Is Anonymous a communist?Is Anonymous a communist?Greg Allanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04345502997844244773noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-67450822006864810132014-04-10T18:58:32.326-04:002014-04-10T18:58:32.326-04:00Anonymous @ 6:07:
You stated "I haven't ...Anonymous @ 6:07:<br /><br />You stated "I haven't read the book yet KC...I am in no hurry to read that book, watch the news about it, nor read all the many 'facts' and opinions, and most probably will never do so."<br /><br />Those are very much <i> in reality</i> comments about William Cohan's book. Apparently you can neither read or remember your own comments.Lance The Supreme Poster of Enlightenmentnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-30542295298375629912014-04-10T18:27:50.740-04:002014-04-10T18:27:50.740-04:00To the 6:07,
You're wrong.To the 6:07,<br />You're wrong.guiowenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11904401455585682885noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-52810118492251277032014-04-10T18:07:25.745-04:002014-04-10T18:07:25.745-04:00I am not commenting on the book actually. I am co...I am not commenting on the book actually. I am commenting on KC's comments about the book in reality. How even odder for you to think otherwise.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-10856956633654384742014-04-10T18:02:35.115-04:002014-04-10T18:02:35.115-04:00Interesting....You haven't read the book, nor ...Interesting....You haven't read the book, nor are you in any hurry to do so. You also in no hurry to watch any news or read facts or opinions about the book.<br /><br />Yet here you are, commenting about it. How very <i>odd</i> of you.Lance The Supreme Poster of Enlightenmentnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-59704513653477295342014-04-10T17:44:33.192-04:002014-04-10T17:44:33.192-04:00I haven't read the book yet KC. I did live th...I haven't read the book yet KC. I did live through the hell this case created in NC, and see how it continues to wreck havoc to this day. Whether you realize it or not, what is done in this case affects a lot of people very negatively and causes harm. So, I am in no hurry to read that book, watch the news about it, nor read all the many 'facts' and opinions, and most probably will never do so. I can see what this case has done to harm a lot of people KC, I don't actually have to hear about it again and again or disect it to know what happened nor to see the harm it has caused. You do not understand that though do you? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-33151449930080347782014-04-10T17:21:28.555-04:002014-04-10T17:21:28.555-04:00To the 4.43:
Thanks for the reply: I suppose it w...To the 4.43:<br /><br />Thanks for the reply: I suppose it will have to remain a mystery.<br /><br />Anytime you wish to post under your own name, rather than anonymously, I invite you to do so!<br /><br />From my angle, I thought that the post was quite clear: Cohan prefers to assert by inference in the book; in his publicity appearances, he's dropped any pretense, and made straight-out assertions of numerous points that he had only left to inference in the book (which I presume you have read). That said, I profoundly apologize that you had difficulty understanding the post.kcjohnson9https://www.blogger.com/profile/09625813296986996867noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-26441468943778201412014-04-10T17:14:35.800-04:002014-04-10T17:14:35.800-04:00Anonymous @ 4:43:
Is that you, White Goodman?Anonymous @ 4:43:<br /><br />Is that you, White Goodman?Lance The Supreme Poster of Enlightenmentnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-69768052102159594902014-04-10T16:43:06.730-04:002014-04-10T16:43:06.730-04:00If I knew the answer I probably wouldn't be bl...If I knew the answer I probably wouldn't be blogging here either KC, but I don't know about that either, since I don't have the answer.<br /><br />Too bad eh? Would you want to actually argue about all this with Mr. Nifong personally on this blog KC? That would give him the chance to respond to your inferred inferences of inferences, or whatever it is that you are doing.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-91953048189643779692014-04-10T16:07:59.333-04:002014-04-10T16:07:59.333-04:00To the 3.32:
I haven't a clue. Maybe you can ...To the 3.32:<br /><br />I haven't a clue. Maybe you can tell me?kcjohnson9https://www.blogger.com/profile/09625813296986996867noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-40997902375604057532014-04-10T15:32:52.914-04:002014-04-10T15:32:52.914-04:00Do you think Mr. Nifong would actually post on thi...Do you think Mr. Nifong would actually post on this blog KC?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-66841025051923746232014-04-10T15:23:38.162-04:002014-04-10T15:23:38.162-04:00To the 2.44:
Have no idea: that's why I asked...To the 2.44:<br /><br />Have no idea: that's why I asked!<br /><br />Of course, you could always choose to post absent the cloak of anonymity :)kcjohnson9https://www.blogger.com/profile/09625813296986996867noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-28737717592142553042014-04-10T14:44:19.976-04:002014-04-10T14:44:19.976-04:00What do you think KC?What do you think KC?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-26922336775822315452014-04-10T14:39:27.468-04:002014-04-10T14:39:27.468-04:00To the 12.59:
Is there a possibility you're M...To the 12.59:<br /><br />Is there a possibility you're Mike Nifong, "Anonymous"?kcjohnson9https://www.blogger.com/profile/09625813296986996867noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-89650834664838852932014-04-10T12:59:41.521-04:002014-04-10T12:59:41.521-04:00Is there a possibility that you are obsessed with ...Is there a possibility that you are obsessed with the case and infer the inferences based on that fixation for purposes of your own self serving interest and commentary KC?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-22230605848211853222014-04-10T11:56:24.916-04:002014-04-10T11:56:24.916-04:00Is Cohan a Communist?Is Cohan a Communist?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-40996787212394259422014-04-10T10:16:45.645-04:002014-04-10T10:16:45.645-04:00To Chris:
Men's Journal piece an excerpt from...To Chris:<br /><br />Men's Journal piece an excerpt from the book--good example of the way Cohan is far bolder in assertions on TV than book.<br /><br />Entire passage does create impression that *something* happened, acc to Steeel. But reader has to make the inference.kcjohnson9https://www.blogger.com/profile/09625813296986996867noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-63661217535955773492014-04-10T10:16:14.394-04:002014-04-10T10:16:14.394-04:00This what happens when people conspire to tell unt...This what happens when people conspire to tell untruths. One or more of the participants forget part of their scripts. Then their stories don't match up.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com