tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post115654855879923077..comments2024-02-24T05:19:10.949-05:00Comments on Durham-in-Wonderland: More Bad Timeskcjohnson9http://www.blogger.com/profile/09625813296986996867noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-1156569702008097612006-08-26T01:21:00.000-04:002006-08-26T01:21:00.000-04:00Professor Johnson: My wife and I just laughed out ...Professor Johnson: <BR/><BR/>My wife and I just laughed out loud on clicking your <A HREF="http://www.anklebitingpundits.com/content/index.php?p=598" REL="nofollow">"see here"</A> link to a former prosecutor's standpoint, inasmuch as he had clearly, earlier today, matured the same thoughts generally permeating my <A HREF="http://crystalmess.blogspot.com/2006/08/mmmmmmmduff.html" REL="nofollow">take</A>, this evening, on "The Gottlieb Files." While I'm gratified to see that others are "in sync" with my musings, I'm mildly dismayed not to have been "in first" because, while it is true that I was not online earlier today in defenence to other responsibilities, there are some, I'm sure, whom I will never be able to wholly convince. <BR/><BR/>As usual, your piece is just great!August Westhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09919963003128838777noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-1156567718955103102006-08-26T00:48:00.000-04:002006-08-26T00:48:00.000-04:00"Outside experts say it is possible for a rapist t...<B>"Outside experts say it is possible for a rapist to leave no DNA evidence."</B> <BR/><BR/>This is one of the most pernicious statements in the article. <BR/><BR/>What are the chances that <B>three </B>violent, forcible penetrations by <B>three </B> separate attackers would leave NO DNA evidence? <BR/><BR/>Let's hold the NYT's feet to the fire over this. Exactly who are these "outside experts" they are citing?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-1156564142512059622006-08-25T23:49:00.000-04:002006-08-25T23:49:00.000-04:00The NYT tells us: "Outside experts say it is possi...The NYT tells us: <BR/><BR/>"Outside experts say it is possible for a rapist to leave no DNA evidence." <BR/><BR/>So why was this guy set free?<BR/><BR/><B>Man Exonerated After 22 Years in Prison Adjusting to New-Found Freedom </B><BR/><BR/>Date: Thursday, July 13, 2006 <BR/><BR/>By: Leonard Greene, Special to BlackAmericaWeb.com <BR/><BR/>It's been one stop after another for freed inmate Alan Newton, who was released from prison last week after 22 years in jail for a crime he did not commit. <BR/><BR/>After a week of parties, picnics and public appearances, Newton, a former bank teller from the Bronx, is adjusting to life on the outside after DNA testing cleared him in the vicious rape and beating of a Bronx woman whose shaky identification sent him away for nearly half his life. <BR/><BR/>DNA from Newton that was compared to a sperm sample recovered as evidence after the rape showed conclusively that Newton had nothing to do with the brutal attack. <BR/><BR/>--http://www.blackamericaweb.com/site.aspx/bawnews/newton713 <BR/><BR/>What say you - NYT, NAACP, Professor Chemerinsky?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-1156561414274680442006-08-25T23:03:00.000-04:002006-08-25T23:03:00.000-04:00Excellent questions . . .Excellent questions . . .Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-1156559403896700662006-08-25T22:30:00.000-04:002006-08-25T22:30:00.000-04:00It's obvious that Nifong or one of his allies leak...It's obvious that Nifong or one of his allies leaked stuff to The New York Times — after the judge imposed a gag order. What are the consequences for Nifong?<BR/>And why did The Times omit the main piece of evidence clearing Seligmann: the video from the ATM during the time the rape supposedly occurred? Why did The Times use the investigator's 33 pages of typewritten notes as the guideline for the lengthy story?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com