tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post115783946312601630..comments2024-02-24T05:19:10.949-05:00Comments on Durham-in-Wonderland: Sunday News, and Information Requestkcjohnson9http://www.blogger.com/profile/09625813296986996867noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-1157940903215412242006-09-10T22:15:00.000-04:002006-09-10T22:15:00.000-04:00If the department did fund the ad, it would not be...If the department did fund the ad, it would not be the first time left-leaning professors have illegally run an ad in the <I>Chronicle</I>:<BR/><BR/>http://www.dukechronicle.com/media/storage/paper884/news/2003/03/25/News/Department.AntiWar.Ad.Violated.Law-1463054.shtml?norewrite200609102202&sourcedomain=www.dukechronicle.com<BR/><BR/>-Steve (Duke '06)Stevenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03733970472607214758noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-1157910685642493962006-09-10T13:51:00.000-04:002006-09-10T13:51:00.000-04:00The simplest way to find the answer to your questi...The simplest way to find the answer to your question (how was the Group 88 Chronicle ad funded) is for a Chonicle staff to leak it. I would be curious to know if the Chronicle staff have been given special directives not to disclose this information. If there were special directives, that would smell really bad. The next question would be "who gave those orders and when".Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-1157866138017980352006-09-10T01:28:00.000-04:002006-09-10T01:28:00.000-04:00BTW, since you are an academic, you may be pleased...BTW, since you are an academic, you may be pleased to know that the statistical odds that Gottlieb's arrest of more Duke students than the other cops in his district was not due to random chance is: <BR/><BR/>p < 0.000000000007<BR/><BR/>That would be considered highly statistically significant.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com