tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post1524634212284987368..comments2024-02-24T05:19:10.949-05:00Comments on Durham-in-Wonderland: More Murphykcjohnson9http://www.blogger.com/profile/09625813296986996867noreply@blogger.comBlogger76125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-60265339680522494982007-05-03T19:29:00.000-04:002007-05-03T19:29:00.000-04:00Has anyone noticed this? Hasn't been updated late...Has anyone noticed this? Hasn't been updated lately.<BR/><BR/>http://www.hcs.harvard.edu/~cyberlaw/wiki/index.php/Wendy_MurphyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-52072959377801422602007-05-03T14:58:00.000-04:002007-05-03T14:58:00.000-04:00On April 28, 2006 Murphy had already brought up th...On April 28, 2006 Murphy had already brought up the "pay-off" theory.<BR/><BR/>http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:BqI9HAsHzFUJ:transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/28/pzn.01.html+wendy+murphy+duke+lacrosse+quotes&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=4&gl=us<BR/><BR/><BR/>"And, then, what I fear is going to happen, someone's going to say, here, how about you have a few bucks? Someone is going to offer her some money, as happened in the Kobe Bryant case, for her to take a dive. That's not justice. That's corruption. That's a two-tiered system, where the rich people walk free. The poor ones go to jail. I'm disgusted that that..."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-66789956612272731612007-05-03T13:33:00.000-04:002007-05-03T13:33:00.000-04:00I happen to know from experience that rape victims...I happen to know from experience that rape victims NEVER accept bribes. It's about power, not money.<BR/><BR/>Thus, if she took the payments, she could not be a rape victim. But since women NEVER LIE about rape, it must be that Crystal doesn't actually exist.<BR/><BR/>Therefor, Crystal was invented by Murphy, Nifong and the G88 to advance their careers. Case closed!GaryBhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02805265981497620290noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-14407840338281842592007-05-03T11:57:00.000-04:002007-05-03T11:57:00.000-04:00MURPHY: Yes. I mean, look, it`s the fact that they...MURPHY: Yes. I mean, look, it`s the fact that they take an awful long time for the defense to come out and say anything meaningful. And the silence is deafening in terms of why they didn`t come forward right away and say, Look, we`re all innocent. What they did was clam up and say, Let`s stick together so we can get away with this.<BR/><BR/>Look, I think the real key here is that these guys, like so many rapists -- and I`m going to say it because, at this point, she`s entitled to the respect that she is a crime victim. These guys watch "CSI," and they know it`s a really bad idea to ejaculate on or in the victim. And maybe what she said, which makes her particularly credible, is, These guys didn`t ejaculate on or inside of my body, which means she deserves extra credibility because no one`s suggesting that she lied about whether there would be DNA found on her person.<BR/><BR/>And Nancy, look, you know, why? Why do we live in a culture people are so willing to assume women are masochist enough to not only do all the things you describe but strangle themselves and tear their own vaginas to make, what, a false claim look good? We would let women be perceived as hysterical masochists rather than believe that if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it`s a duck? Can we use a little bit of common sense here?<BR/><BR/>Forget respect and disrespect for a minute! How about common sense and decency? A DA who was not born yesterday has said, after two weeks of investigation, I believe this woman was brutally raped and attacked. And now, because of DNA -- which never tells the whole story, ever -- somehow, we`re going to just abandon the case and celebrate the boys as, you know, having had a bad night<BR/><BR/>It's amazing this woman can look in the mirrorAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-72642400504268755152007-05-03T01:08:00.000-04:002007-05-03T01:08:00.000-04:005:59, and everyone else who argues that she hasn't...5:59, and everyone else who argues that she hasn't actually slandered or libeled anyone, check out http://durhamwonderland.blogspot.com/2006/12/wendy-murphy-file.html<BR/><BR/>Specifically, look for the following:<BR/><BR/>(April 10) “These guys, like so many rapists—and I’m going to say it because, at this point, she’s entitled to the respect that she is a crime victim.”<BR/><BR/>In other words, yes, she has called them rapists, and made clear that it was intentional by justifying it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-15178024665558086402007-05-03T01:00:00.000-04:002007-05-03T01:00:00.000-04:00Wait, she's just a victim of the network bookers a...Wait, she's just a victim of the network bookers and bad information. No, wait, she forgot to take her meds. Oh well, no harm, no foul.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-88313284147710482032007-05-03T00:49:00.000-04:002007-05-03T00:49:00.000-04:00KC vs. Wendy Murphy on the O'Reilly Factor. Someo...KC vs. Wendy Murphy on the O'Reilly Factor. Someone make it happen. Heck I bet she would no show, which I guess would be fine since we could doll up a paper cutout of her and we wouldn't have to hear her.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-90326960164328670762007-05-03T00:01:00.001-04:002007-05-03T00:01:00.001-04:00The solution is simple. KC just needs to put out ...The solution is simple. KC just needs to put out a challenge to publicly debate anyone who still wants to defend CGM. Without cross examination, the Murphys and Petersons can say anything and a newspaper will print it bc it is controversial. Offer to debate them at Duke and if no one accepts, claim victory. If someone does accept the offer, I predict KC will throw a no-hitter.<BR/> Brant JonesAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-43229660787565606832007-05-03T00:01:00.000-04:002007-05-03T00:01:00.000-04:00The AG of NC stated these kids were innocent. We ...The AG of NC stated these kids were innocent. We all know people are called in to play devils advocate on these televisions shows. But this case is over. She isn't just playing devils advocate anymore, she is doing this personally for herself. She needs be sued or at the very least Bill O'Reily and other talk show hosts need to call her on her crazy statements and then tell her she is no longer welcomed on their program.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-35282067428288983642007-05-02T23:54:00.000-04:002007-05-02T23:54:00.000-04:00A message from Wendy Murphy, Esq.I'm rich, famous,...A message from Wendy Murphy, Esq.<BR/><BR/>I'm rich, famous, influential, and highly intelligent--you losers are not. Keep on posting, nobodies. I'm on a private jet typing this, while you wannabes are crying over spilt milk.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-85543884225641362792007-05-02T23:48:00.000-04:002007-05-02T23:48:00.000-04:00The Levicy Exam post from KC has 222 comments.Good...The Levicy Exam post from KC has 222 comments.<BR/><BR/>Good Grief.<BR/>I think we have a good idea now who is listening to Murphy...and wants to believe that someone is speaking for women.<BR/>And here I thought I was trying to speak in support of all people.Gary Packwoodhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05177986821224068759noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-18489319023474283422007-05-02T23:42:00.000-04:002007-05-02T23:42:00.000-04:00Mike in Nevada said...However, I had mixed feeling...Mike in Nevada said...<BR/><I>However, I had mixed feelings when you published her phone number and FAX number in "A Question for Wendy Murphy". I think that this borders on harassment and intimidation.</I><BR/><BR/>Actually no. She is a public figure who uses her position, the name of her employer and her "qualifications" to make controversial statements about controversial issues. She has every right to receive mail disputing her statements particularly if those statements are slanderous.<BR/><BR/>Deklan Singh said... <BR/><BR/><I>So, I'm curious. How exactly is Wendy Murphy's profession listed on her resume? Does it say LIAR directly under her name in bold type, or is there a list of her professional engagements extending down the page where her different methods of fraud and deception are described in detail?</I><BR/><BR/>I believe it says "professional liar".<BR/><BR/>Mike in Nevada said...<BR/><I>Whether or not we agree with her vitriolic misguided opinions, we should not be calling her employer to express our disagreement. This, IMHO, is intrusive and could interfere with her employment.</I><BR/><BR/>She uses her employer's name to lend weight to her statements. The employer has a right to know what she is doing and what impact she is having. Their good name is mud in her hands.Greg Allanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04345502997844244773noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-83654190122262735022007-05-02T23:30:00.000-04:002007-05-02T23:30:00.000-04:00Regarding the potential for a libel/slander - thes...Regarding the potential for a libel/slander - these torts require that the person make a factual assertion that is untrue and that damages the person's reputation. Statements of opinion in almost all cases don't count. For this half witted, opportunistic disgrace to my profession (all of which is purely my opinion)to be liable she would have to be stating these things as facts. In all likelihood, by using the "question" format and characterizing them as things she has heard, she is in the clear. Also note that with public figures, which Cooper clearly is and the others are to one extent or another, there is the added burden of having to prove that she made the statements with "malice". Any suit is likely a non-starter.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-80421789943153906552007-05-02T23:23:00.000-04:002007-05-02T23:23:00.000-04:00If Kim and the accuser had really been paid a bunc...If Kim and the accuser had really been paid a bunch of money, there'd be some evidence of it, such as new cars, etc. I doubt they'd "lay low" until all the attention passed. If they waited for that, they probably would not be free to spend the money in their lifetimes. <BR/><BR/>Durham LawyerAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-76613010812029781812007-05-02T23:22:00.000-04:002007-05-02T23:22:00.000-04:00Carolyn says:Cindy said: "The 600 or so faculty t...Carolyn says:<BR/><BR/>Cindy said: "The 600 or so faculty that have laid low are as bad as the Gang of 88..."<BR/><BR/>Personally, Cindy, I consider the silent faculty to be 'good Germans'. They had a moral and ethical duty to speak up when their own students were being attacked but they chose not to. So let them live with the label. They earned it and they deserve it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-35720044890387429542007-05-02T23:19:00.000-04:002007-05-02T23:19:00.000-04:00Thanks to Wendy, I think we have a new definition ...Thanks to Wendy, I think we have a new definition of Murphy's Law. <BR/><BR/>Old: "If something can happen, it will".<BR/><BR/>New: "If nothing happened, it did."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-64504349778085564742007-05-02T21:58:00.000-04:002007-05-02T21:58:00.000-04:00It seems to me that she also is libeling the attor...It seems to me that she also is libeling the attorneys when she claims payoffs. Surely someone can deal with this by legal means. Do they really have to take this?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-39134377349779712852007-05-02T21:26:00.000-04:002007-05-02T21:26:00.000-04:00Speaking of spineless hand-wringers, did you ever ...Speaking of spineless hand-wringers, did you ever get a report from the Grant Fareed appearance at Williams?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-60684804991237711342007-05-02T21:08:00.000-04:002007-05-02T21:08:00.000-04:006:08: "It is the end of the day.Just guess who is ...6:08: "It is the end of the day.<BR/>Just guess who is still the DA?"<BR/><BR/>Uh, that would be the same guy who lost his motion to dismiss the Bar charges last month, and who is going to get his a$$ handed to him next month at his sure-to-be-an exercise-in-public-humiliation Bar trial.<BR/><BR/>Enjoy!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-59756177164997016372007-05-02T21:06:00.000-04:002007-05-02T21:06:00.000-04:00When Ms Murphy seeks out oportunities repeatedly t...When Ms Murphy seeks out oportunities repeatedly to go on national TV or to be quoted in the NY TIMES and makes all kinds of unsubstantiated comments, she should not be surprised when people seek her out to question her statements. It is true she even suggested one of the Duke players was probably abused by his parents? If so, and there are legal grounds she should be sued. But I suspect, just as I now (perhaps unfairly) questioned her<BR/>ethics, she will not be blameable because she qualifies her comments by saying "I would not be surprised if.....not I know for sure the player was abused"<BR/><BR/>I think she makes herself fair game for e-mails by deciding to be a public figure publically judging others.<BR/><BR/>I have sent her 3 civil e-mails. If she got them, she never responded.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-13235744024024851202007-05-02T20:58:00.000-04:002007-05-02T20:58:00.000-04:00yoddidy yoyawzaaaaaaaaaaaaai got me dah honkiesnow...yoddidy yo<BR/>yawzaaaaaaaaaaaaa<BR/>i got me dah honkies<BR/>now I's on welfah<BR/><BR/>PantiesAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-85579416560401206372007-05-02T20:55:00.000-04:002007-05-02T20:55:00.000-04:00KC, I know that you must have the ear of the defen...KC, I know that you must have the ear of the defense attorneys in this case as a result of your careful and detailed reporting of this hoax. PLEASE, PLEASE prevail upon them to shut this wench up. There must be a way to make WM and the Wilmington Journal (Cash the Trash) either put up or shut up. They are slandering the defense attorneys and the office of the AG of NC. First Amendment rights only go so far and when someone goes on national tv and spews the lies that WM continues to do, there must be some recourse by the three families, their attorneys and the State of NC to shut this ignorant bitch up.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-32860690657348721702007-05-02T20:46:00.000-04:002007-05-02T20:46:00.000-04:006:08: "It is the end of the day.Just guess who is...6:08: "It is the end of the day.<BR/>Just guess who is still the DA?"<BR/><BR/> <BR/>Hey, Mikey, glad to see you're still checking in here. Some people have been speculating that you'd commit suicide, but I've never believed it. Narcissists like you rarely ever off themselves. (How can you kill the one you love best?). But you'd better not be spending too much time on the internet reading these blogs, Mikey. Your trial is next month, so you have very little time left to be D.A. in Durham (or to hold a valid license to practice law in NC). So you'd better get off the computer and get back to work ASAP. There's still time for you to frame a few more innocent defendants before your lawyers embarrass themselves in front of the Bar again, and you go down in ignominious defeat.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-67188370694627081942007-05-02T20:35:00.000-04:002007-05-02T20:35:00.000-04:00"Slander."If that doesn't apply here - where a wom..."Slander."<BR/><BR/>If that doesn't apply here - where a woman is knowingly telling defamatory lies about people - then I don't know that there is any such thing as slander.<BR/><BR/>This particular woman is funded by the government, so you know that if you sue her, there are huge purses you can swipe from. (Which I guess means that I want them to sue the taxpayers, which means that, in a strange way, I'm asking them to sue myself.)White Bonerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05745983403055912381noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-66740196875865098432007-05-02T20:27:00.000-04:002007-05-02T20:27:00.000-04:00Over on John in Carolina, John is calling out the ...Over on John in Carolina, John is calling out the George L. McLendon,<BR/>Dean of the Faculty of Arts & Sciences for the silence of the A&S faculty. Exactly my point - the Duke faculty silently supports the Gang of 88. For all the venting and speculation of litigation toward them, they are the tip of the ice berg. As despicable as their remarks and beliefs are, at least they had the balls to speak their racist minds. The rest of the Duke faculty and administration are just spineless, hand wringing fellow travelers.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com