tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post1830370987723566237..comments2024-02-24T05:19:10.949-05:00Comments on Durham-in-Wonderland: The Wendy Murphy Filekcjohnson9http://www.blogger.com/profile/09625813296986996867noreply@blogger.comBlogger179125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-22677118320663578042015-02-16T09:15:31.905-05:002015-02-16T09:15:31.905-05:00Murphy’s bizarre claims to USA Today prompted me t...Murphy’s bizarre claims to USA Today prompted me to perform a Lexis/Nexis search of her myriad case-related appearances. <b><a href="http://comparedadvisors.com/" rel="nofollow">Best Solicitors in london</a></b> The results were deeply disturbing.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16136153498665729298noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-11032490028967801042012-04-28T16:24:31.871-04:002012-04-28T16:24:31.871-04:00I always hated her. Such a bitch with an agenda to...I always hated her. Such a bitch with an agenda to put falsely accused men behind bars.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-65891814878646563872009-06-07T19:17:38.935-04:002009-06-07T19:17:38.935-04:00I heard Wendy expound on Jane Mitchell - Why there...I heard Wendy expound on Jane Mitchell - Why theree is not a concerted effort to stop child abductions <br /><br /> <br /><br />I am just sick and tired of turning on the TV <br /><br />And seeing that another child is missing or another adult has disappeared.<br /><br /> <br /><br />We can do something about this.<br /><br /> Are you aware that N.A.S.A. Takes videos of the entire U.S. - 24 / 7 <br /><br /> They have night vision capability, and are able to get very detailed Video.<br /><br /> I have heard they can see the date on a dime from space<br /><br /> My question is:<br /><br />It seems many are afraid to stir the kettle.<br /><br />The method is there to solve these crimes and possibly saves lives <br /><br />Why doesn't N.A.S.A. Use its technology to give to police when someone goes missing.<br /><br />Within hours they could turn over the recorded period of the abduction area to the police from the time of the abduction <br /><br />The police could then view and zoom in on the Area of the abduction <br /><br />And see what type of activity there was around the area EVEN AT NIGHT<br /><br />And then follow any suspicious people or cars seen in the video to where they next went - <br /><br /> You know as will as I One case solved in this way would definitely put a BIG dent into these crimes. <br /><br /> <br /><br />This would have solved the Caylee Anthony case, The Haliegh Cummings Case, The Trenton Duckette case, <br /><br />The Sandra Cantu case, the Polly Klaas Case, The Stacy and Lacy Peterson cases .......etc etc, etc.<br /><br /> <br /><br />Why don't they do it -- Obama and his Liberal cronies would all be crying ‘Big Brother’ and invasion of privacy <br /><br /> <br /><br />I think its just another way our society has misplaced its values.<br /><br /> <br /><br />Finding a child is much more important than any loss of freedoms we may have to endure <br /><br /> <br /><br />The Technology IS THERE.<br /><br /><br /><br />Bill Tomsick<br /><br />Cape Coral FL<br /><br />216 759 6345Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-44375125949811950342009-03-30T14:46:00.000-04:002009-03-30T14:46:00.000-04:00It is unfortunate that Wendy Murphy has been attac...It is unfortunate that Wendy Murphy has been attacked for speaking up for victims. Perpetrators have always tried to discredit their victims. I applaud Dr. Murphy's decision to stand up for the those who are on the short side of the law. Now the rich and powerful try to discredit her. Truth and the messengers of truth will always be be lambasted by those who wish to take down the young and poor. I applaud Ms. Murphy and her efforts to bring justice to victims.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-516129318464329052008-11-14T10:50:00.000-05:002008-11-14T10:50:00.000-05:00Are there any links to the full transcripts of the...Are there any links to the full transcripts of these interviews? I am interested to read these quotes in context.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-47485492138537045972008-09-08T14:51:00.000-04:002008-09-08T14:51:00.000-04:00Who commits most sex crimes? Well, 95% of all new ...Who commits most sex crimes? Well, 95% of all new sex crimes are committed by those NOT on the registry. Family members and those known to the family commit 98% of all sex crimes. So much for stranger danger.<BR/>2nd question. Who is MORE LIKELY to committ a sex crime upon release from prison? Sex Offenders or NON-sex offenders?<BR/><BR/>For the answer, go here. www.cfcoklahoma.org and see the article, "Revisiting Department of Justice Recidivism Statistics and More Shocking Truths."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-51555684174077695452008-07-10T03:16:00.000-04:002008-07-10T03:16:00.000-04:00She's just been running her mouth tonight on the J...She's just been running her mouth tonight on the JonBenet Ramsey case - and once again she is calamitously wrong, still claiming the parents are guilty as far as I can tell. Even Nancy Grace has given up on that, but not the insane (IMO) Ms Murphy.A Voice of Sanityhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11285284153694191831noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-84183931911691261212008-03-12T13:44:00.000-04:002008-03-12T13:44:00.000-04:00http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7vNggdW3lZ8Murphy i...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7vNggdW3lZ8<BR/><BR/>Murphy is not an expert. She lies everytime she opens her foul mouth and yes, she wears combat boots and is as fascist as they come.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-63721660224113057222008-02-20T23:44:00.000-05:002008-02-20T23:44:00.000-05:00What makes me sick concerning Wendy Murphy is her ...What makes me sick concerning Wendy Murphy is her thinly veiled attempt to hide behind being a "CHILD ADVOCATE" when in relaity she is clearly a women's activist without regard to anything male. I have written to Fox News' Bill O'rielly several times asking him to use another commentary. I have tried to point out her clear women's rights, women's lib agenda. I consider myself very right leaning but Wendy Murphy is a piece of work with her women's agenda. PLEASE Fox News, get someone else besides Murphy! Murphy has an agenda! Her opinions are strongly tainted! She makes me sick! Seek another person! Let Wendy Murphy go her way dictating that men are bad and women are good. Let Wendy Murphy stand on the opinion that women should be allowed to run wild. Let Wendy Murphy advocate for child rapists as long as they are female, spouting there is a difference between the male child rapist verses the female child rapist and that the female needs less control. Go figure!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-684614876331812382007-09-10T05:27:00.000-04:002007-09-10T05:27:00.000-04:00Poor twisted woman. It's obvious that she has no l...Poor twisted woman. It's obvious that she has no life, and her professional career has sunk to the point of mouthing FOX propaganda commentaries. What a waste of a law degree!GeronimoVhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16811108363773942136noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-40757347708589552202007-08-01T13:41:00.000-04:002007-08-01T13:41:00.000-04:00I know Wendy Murphy personally. And i have to say,...I know Wendy Murphy personally. And i have to say, she takes her strange approach to arguing even in a personal setting. Unwilling and unable to see any truth but her own, Ms. Murphy is the definition of stubborn. Her motto, "All men are rapists and all women are victims" will undermine the justice system and bring an end to what we know as "civil liberties". Thank god she is the minority in this argument or we would all be screwed.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-55187845114101272382007-07-10T09:54:00.000-04:002007-07-10T09:54:00.000-04:00Hey Bill Anderson: She Teaches a class every semes...Hey Bill Anderson: She Teaches a class every semester....I took it last year. Should do a little better research. (Don't be what you are accusing her of). No question she missed it on the Duke case, but she has an interesting and passionate perspective on our system that is worth debate! Pretty good chance she had some inside facts you didn't, and the news didn't release. Again I think she was wrong about the Duke case but she's an entertaining commentator and a good Prof. So you disagree with her...great...calm down, she's not Brian Williams she is meant to come from a certain perspective on these shows. The Idea that she should be disbarred, or not teach is really crazy.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-11611992381969838662007-04-12T20:04:00.000-04:002007-04-12T20:04:00.000-04:00Dear Mr. Reed, Mr. Seligman, and Mr. Finnerty; It ...Dear Mr. Reed, Mr. Seligman, and Mr. Finnerty; <BR/><BR/>It took 395 days, but this travesty has ended. Finally, the State Attorney General came forward and told the world that no crime had occurred, that the prosecutor was out of control, and the accuser was a liar.<BR/><BR/>So you get to walk free. Which is as it should be. Which is how it should have been within a matter of hours after the accusation was made.<BR/><BR/>But will there will be justice? Already the media is focusing on that malignant woman's "chaotic life". Already the NC Attorney General's office is indicating that they don't favor pursuing her. The game's afoot; in spite of what she did to you, she's a victim and should be allowed to go on about her miserable life.<BR/><BR/>And Nifong? Well, if there is any justice at all, he'll wind up disbarred and in prison. That actually could happen; we'll see.<BR/><BR/>But, as you are aware - as you made very clear in your statements before the press yesterday - there is a larger issue at work here. This issue is the massive degree of discrimination and injustice encountered by men everywhere in this society, in the area of familial and sexual relations.<BR/><BR/>You can't deny it; you can't question it; you have seen it yourselves. That you weren't destroyed by it is due to two reasons. First, your families have considerable means and could protect you. Second, the accusation was picked up by the national press and therefore the whole nation was looking. ABC News did a good job for you; they were the first (and for a long time the only) media source that was skeptical and avoided a rush to judgement. <BR/><BR/>Where would you three be if you hadn't been fairly well off, with families behind you and lots of publicity which wound up working for you? You'd be in prison for rape. Your lives would be over, on the word of a drugged-out liar and at the whim of a prosecutor who is a criminal.<BR/><BR/>Are you three the only ones in the nation who have been subject to such a scurrilous attack? Is Nifong the only rogue prosecutor who is out there?<BR/><BR/>You know better. At least tens of thousands of men have been railroaded and are being destroyed today by the attitude that was on clear display when you were first accused.<BR/><BR/>The despicable attitude displayed by the 88 professors at Duke, and by the Duke administration - an attitude which none of them have repudiated - is widely held among campus faculties around the country. These nutty professors are doing their best to indoctrinate men and women who will be our future leaders in the same bile-filled, insane, and contemptible attitudes toward men that they themselves displayed toward you.<BR/><BR/>So, now you are free at last. But your female accuser is going to walk, unless someone does something. Nifong'll get his, but then he's a man, isn't he? The double standard will bring him down even as it lets her walk. Of course, he happens to deserve it, but she deserves it too.<BR/><BR/>You now have a decision to make. <BR/><BR/>You have been massively wronged, and while you will be able to right that wrong to yourselves, the widespread wrong will remain. You are at this point in time uniquely positioned to attack that wrong, and you must do so.<BR/><BR/>In the Land of the (formerly) Free, a man stands guilty as accused, if his accuser is a woman. A man can be stripped of his home, his property, his children at the whim of a woman, if the man was so foolish as to marry her. <BR/><BR/>There is a widespread, and totally insane, attitude that a man is a predator and therefore if he isn't guilty today, then he either was yesterday or will be tomorrow, so punishing him is appropriate. The courts have bought into this insanity, with the consequence that men have lost virtually all rights under the Constitution when the matter before the court has to do with family or sex.<BR/><BR/>Men are literally enslaved paying child support for children that are not theirs - when everyone including the court recognizes and acknowledges the truth that the child is not the man's. (http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/missouristatenews/story/5042368FFF852CB6862572B9000B317F?OpenDocument)<BR/><BR/>The growing witchhunt in this land about sexual abuse is targeted almost exclusively at men. The presumption is that men are indeed predators. Granting that some small percentage are, the fact remains that the very vast majority are not. Even many men say to themselves: "I know that I would never behave that way, but I know that other men do, so I must help catch them." Then, like yourselves, they are appalled when they themselves stand accused, and presumed guilty.<BR/><BR/>You have experienced it first hand. You were unusually well situated to survive it. Most men are not so well positioned.<BR/><BR/>And now it is time for you to attack. This attitude must be destroyed. Those who promulgate the attitude (you know who many of them are, just as I know and everyone reading this knows) must be brought down.<BR/><BR/>To begin, Crystal Gail Mangum must face felony charges for the monstrous thing she did - not just to you, but to all men. She needs to go to prison, if for no other reason than to deter the many other crazy females out there who'll accuse a man on any pretext or none. Women routinely get away with this; it must end.<BR/><BR/>Nifong needs a nice long prison sentence, and I certainly hope that your lawsuit strips him of literally everything.<BR/><BR/>And beyond them is Duke University. And the 88 nutty professors. And the National Organization of Women. And an increasingly poisonous culture that is determined to destroy men.<BR/><BR/>There are millions of men who will join you. But you must lead. At this point in time, no one but you can lead this fight.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-71389439917571068302007-03-01T19:16:00.000-05:002007-03-01T19:16:00.000-05:00Wendy Murphy is the most logical voice among the "...Wendy Murphy is the most logical voice among the "experts" . The vitriol and hideous tone of these comments speaks volumes about the sick American psyche with its hateful bigotry, shallow, even burtal mentality, and programmed direction - anti-thought, anti-women, anti-humane, anti-wisdom. We need more like Wendy and less (who have sold out) like Nancy Grace. Wendy had it right with the Anna Nicole Smith case, unlike the rest of them, when she noted that the cart was put before the horse. Something really smells in that case, and the odor is coming from the Stern camp. Nancy Grace seems on a mission to hide the foul plays going on.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-38849038986435373352007-01-22T19:26:00.000-05:002007-01-22T19:26:00.000-05:00Thanks for the information. I saw an opinion piece...Thanks for the information. I saw an opinion piece by Murphy in the Wilmington Journal, which showed she is still making some of the same misleading ststements. <br /><br />I have to think she did a lot of damage to innocent people while a prosecutor, if she had anywhere near the status and power she implies in her cv.boatbrainhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01874838554949227800noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-60829977760877169842007-01-11T14:23:00.000-05:002007-01-11T14:23:00.000-05:00covers everything related to Entertainment and Nig...covers everything related to Entertainment and Nightlife, <br /><br />such as Nightclubs, Event Photos, Restaurants,Special <br /><br />Events, Event Tickets, Maps, Photos, Dating, Hotels, Hot <br /><br />Spots, Event Promoters, Fashion Shows and More! On Hype1 <br /><br />you can plan your night by viewing thousands of <br /><br />nightclubs, events and restaurants across many cities in <br /><br />the world. Remember , going out is easy, knowing where, is <br /><br />not.Palanivel Rajahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08359956947387572314noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-47953024595950765572007-01-01T14:27:00.000-05:002007-01-01T14:27:00.000-05:00Her recent USA Today article actually made me stop...Her recent USA Today article actually made me stop and write her an email because it was so factually inaccurate it was a little disturbing. These are a few of the things I wrote to her:<br /><br /> First, I urge you to read N.C. Gen. Stat. 8C-1 Rule 412 once again, which discusses the relevance of the victim’s past behavior for rape OR SEXUAL OFFENSE CASES. The statute reads: (b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the sexual behavior of the complainant is irrelevant to any issue in the prosecution unless such behavior…(2) Is evidence of specific instances of sexual behavior offered for the purpose of showing that the act or acts charged were not committed by the defendant. Consequently, a judge is likely to be persuaded that the fact that other men’s genetic material was found inside of the complaining witness on the night of the alleged offense (despite her now clearly fabricated claim that she had not had sexual relations for more than a week before the night of the alleged attack) offers a plausible explanation that the alleged sexual offenses (if they in fact occurred) were committed by other men, and not these three defendants. Thus, even with the exclusion of the rape charge, the defense would still be able to introduce the evidence; the Constitution would preclude any other outcome.<br /><br />Secondly, you missed the mark completely on the photo lineup. You completely gloss over the fact that the lineup violated a host of specific Durham, state, and federal requirements for photo identifications. Why did they choose to deviate from the regulations to begin with? <br /><br /> Finally, uncorroborated double hearsay regarding a $2M payout is completely irrelevant and simply sensational journalism at its best. Even if true, the alumni may be motivated by more than the guilt or innocence of the accused. Anyways, Wendy, feel free to correct me on anything you wish, bet I felt obligated to address some of the glaring problems in your analysis of the issues.JKWhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09690725721266649941noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-2009299191030514942007-01-01T14:02:00.000-05:002007-01-01T14:02:00.000-05:00K.C., this post knocked my socks off. Rock on!K.C., this post knocked my socks off. Rock on!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-33823353209664019282007-01-01T10:05:00.000-05:002007-01-01T10:05:00.000-05:00I just looked throught the MA Rules of Professiona...I just looked throught the MA Rules of Professional Conduct, and if there is a rule similar to the provision in the NY version regarding "non-legal services," it did not jump out at me. There is a MA provision about application of the Rules to "legal related services" (which include accounting, financial planning, etc.), but I do not know whether this could be interpreted to include television commentary. I also did not see that handy catchall injunction against fraud, deceit etc. that could possibly be used to cover Ms. Murphy's comments. Maybe I missed it. Her nationally televised comments are a disgrace to the legal profession, and I hope something--an employer or a suit for libel/slander/defamation==pulls her up short. Since her conduct is, in fact, highly unprofessional, it would be reasonable to think the Rules of Professional Conduct could apply and work to keep her somewhat in check. It is not clear to me that they do. Maybe some reform is in order?<br /><br />ObserverAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-80158176926310277582007-01-01T09:58:00.000-05:002007-01-01T09:58:00.000-05:00re above post--
agree, sexual history, wardrobe, ...re above post--<br /><br />agree, sexual history, wardrobe, etc r irrelevant--but alleged victim's "history" is fair game<br /><br />RPAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-18025790857012638962007-01-01T06:36:00.000-05:002007-01-01T06:36:00.000-05:00Rape shield laws spread across the common law worl...Rape shield laws spread across the common law world, though generally in a far less drastic form than in the US, because every victim cross-examination opened with 'What were you wearing at the time?' followed quickly by 'And dressed like that, you did not think my client, the defendant, would take it you were available?' An unmarried woman who was not a virgin could expect to be asked why the defendant would not think she was availabel to anyone. A woman without injuries could expect to be asked if she'd resisted and if not, why not.<br /><br />The rape shield laws obviously need reform, but that is not the same thing as abolition.<br /><br />It is also not immediately obvious why there should be some special offence of falsely accusing rape but not other crimes. Now where I come from the alleged victim's condut, on facts we now know, would probably amount to perverting the course of justice which carries a sentence of 14 years. Ditto the actions of Nifong. If you want to restrain tyrannical prosecutions you need punish tyrannical prosecutors.<br /><br />If Nifong had carried out his duties according to law, these indictments would never have happened. The law reform Nifong's conduct calls for should focus on the unchecked power of prosecutors, not reverting sexual assault laws to the Middle Ages.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-38010836649019456132007-01-01T00:27:00.000-05:002007-01-01T00:27:00.000-05:00victim,
roman polanski
happy new yearvictim,<br /><br />roman polanski<br /><br />happy new yearRoman Polanskihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07691343400955357885noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-33719207883989106942006-12-31T23:55:00.000-05:002006-12-31T23:55:00.000-05:00okey-dokey
i'll let u know what name i choseokey-dokey<br /><br />i'll let u know what name i choseAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-71322251224799249752006-12-31T23:16:00.000-05:002006-12-31T23:16:00.000-05:00jc don't use blue because when we use links here t...jc don't use blue because when we use links here they come across in blue that will make it to confussing. Please try a name if you are in the show biz field then tailor a name around that? That is just my opinion.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-38984204913458087452006-12-31T23:03:00.000-05:002006-12-31T23:03:00.000-05:00victim,
if i post in blue, no one else can use it...victim,<br /><br />if i post in blue, no one else can use it?<br /><br />hv mainly used the internet as research, so i don't know about these things<br /><br />thanks<br /><br />jc<br /><br />PS I'm actually flattered that i have an "admirer"--this boy is funny, but i was beginning to wonder y no one was acknowledging my posts--and to b honest--if i had the time--imitating an opinionated bastard like myself must b fun<br /><br />happy new year to all, and someone let me know about the blue thingAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com