tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post2774992382159348938..comments2024-02-24T05:19:10.949-05:00Comments on Durham-in-Wonderland: Institutional Response to Crisis Panelkcjohnson9http://www.blogger.com/profile/09625813296986996867noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-47633644456039410462007-10-01T01:19:00.000-04:002007-10-01T01:19:00.000-04:00This was one of your best posts, KC. I got the fe...This was one of your best posts, KC. I got the feeling that you felt vindicated a little bit by what was said. Again: you can't let this pass you by: those of us who have come to appreciate your work should have the benefit of your future work. Thanks, again. -- Steve W.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-43205016922009825142007-09-30T06:25:00.000-04:002007-09-30T06:25:00.000-04:00A hot flash to those who seem to think the "news" ...A hot flash to those who seem to think the "news" was once more objective.<BR/><BR/>Wrong! It was never objective. <BR/><BR/>That is easy to prove. Decade in and decade out.lonetownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10969510756729828503noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-78407146866385498602007-09-29T15:53:00.000-04:002007-09-29T15:53:00.000-04:00Can Likud and Labour just get along? :)RRHCan Likud and Labour just get along? :)<BR/><BR/>RRHAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-41593687550689520662007-09-29T13:30:00.000-04:002007-09-29T13:30:00.000-04:00I understood that Debrah and that's why I put a bi...I understood that Debrah and that's why I put a big ol' smiley afterward, i.e., it was a joke.Steven Horwitzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00470758334242360804noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-33515770857044833142007-09-29T12:14:00.000-04:002007-09-29T12:14:00.000-04:00Let me make myself clearer.I wasn't asking KC to b...Let me make myself clearer.<BR/><BR/>I wasn't asking KC to blog while <I>panelling</I>.<BR/><BR/>Just to later post something about his participation on the panel.<BR/><BR/>That should not require grand ambidexterity.Debrahhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04567454727276881424noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-68728073620515371652007-09-29T12:04:00.000-04:002007-09-29T12:04:00.000-04:00Actually, he hasn't posted at all about the panel ...Actually, he hasn't posted at all about the panel he was on, mostly because it's very hard to liveblog and be on a panel at the same time. :)<BR/><BR/>But a summary of the "new media" panel would be nice KC.Steven Horwitzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00470758334242360804noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-21259244833016750712007-09-29T11:07:00.000-04:002007-09-29T11:07:00.000-04:00There is live webcast athttp://www.law.duke.edu/we...There is live webcast at<BR/>http://www.law.duke.edu/webcast/<BR/><BR/>KC - Please post on your participation too. Thanks.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-45791340858604014652007-09-29T10:59:00.000-04:002007-09-29T10:59:00.000-04:00I don't recall reading anything that KC posted on ...I don't recall reading anything that KC posted on his participation on one of the panels.<BR/><BR/>I suppose he thinks we already know his views.......so he modestly illuminates the other participants.<BR/><BR/>Yet, <I>he doesn't say.</I>Debrahhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04567454727276881424noreply@blogger.com