tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post3035874772724920771..comments2024-02-24T05:19:10.949-05:00Comments on Durham-in-Wonderland: The Meehan Transcriptkcjohnson9http://www.blogger.com/profile/09625813296986996867noreply@blogger.comBlogger56125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-90588174020026203212006-12-27T04:04:00.000-05:002006-12-27T04:04:00.000-05:00Is KC Johnson gay? He looks so cute in his bowtie,...Is KC Johnson gay? He looks so cute in his bowtie, and his writing is like freebase for the soul.<br /><br />I think I'm in love.<br /><br />The Hershey Warrior<br /><br />PS Do you like candy?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-57448748204247174712006-12-26T22:39:00.000-05:002006-12-26T22:39:00.000-05:00re the duker's comment
I agree that this case wou...re the duker's comment<br /><br />I agree that this case would never have existed if Crystal Mangum knew her lies would result in Class 1 felony charges<br /><br />Sad to say, but society cares more about women--or pretends to<br /><br />I'm not sure whichAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-30799265319832953392006-12-26T22:14:00.000-05:002006-12-26T22:14:00.000-05:00hey dukie,
u know, u can apply the same principle...hey dukie,<br /><br />u know, u can apply the same principle to Brodhead:<br /><br />Why did u fire the coach, Dickie?<br /><br />What are you afraid of?<br /><br />Why are you afraid of the 88 crotches?<br /><br />Let's get down--like Mr Brown--and dig what taboos we're dealing with here.<br /><br />hey, KC, taboos are part of the historical record, aren't they?<br /><br />What is Dickie afraid of--what is it?<br /><br />jcAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-41351436925304798592006-12-26T22:01:00.000-05:002006-12-26T22:01:00.000-05:00I think this is a pretty funny thread--Meehan, Joh...I think this is a pretty funny thread--Meehan, Johnson, Nifong--all troublemakers.<br /><br />As an historian, Johnson should definitely have examined the reasons women make false accusations--from the legal standpoint.<br /><br />Long live James Brow.<br /><br />DukieAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-76639371902296746762006-12-26T21:45:00.000-05:002006-12-26T21:45:00.000-05:00emmy, meehan and nifong r coconspirators, a k a, t...emmy, meehan and nifong r coconspirators, a k a, thugs<br /><br />it's not complicated<br /><br />speaking of thugs, suggest u visit liestoppers to view CGM's interesting portrait--i'd like to photograph all these thugs: they are all incredibly photogenic<br /><br />did u read my post on Socratic dialogue?<br /><br />jcAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-75214992927921634232006-12-26T21:25:00.000-05:002006-12-26T21:25:00.000-05:00"DR. MEEHAN. I can’t answer with a yes or no . . ...."DR. MEEHAN. I can’t answer with a yes or no . . . A typical report, and this was not a typical report, but a standard report will reflect all the DNA profiles of that, all the DNA data from that information, from that person . . . So could we have said that? Could we have done that? Yes, perhaps we could have." <br /><br />Way to play with innocent young men's lives, Meehan...justifying why you left out the fact that none of the DNA in and on the false accuser matched any of the indicted Lacrosse players. Privacy issues? What a CROCK! Do you sleep well at night? What a disgrace you are...do you always do what "the client" tells you to, even if it can crucify INNOCENT people? Boy, you would have fit right in in Nazi Germany, with that professional philosophy ("just following orders", after all, was their mantra)...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-65004043793159678092006-12-26T21:17:00.000-05:002006-12-26T21:17:00.000-05:00Have to agree with the Duder--a big gap in KC's co...Have to agree with the Duder--a big gap in KC's coverage of case is the legal fault line that encourages underclass individuals to "cry rape."<br /><br />It's definitely one of the most important aspects of case that has not been addressed.<br /><br />Thanks, Duder.<br /><br />Dukie '08Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-45123599368320437792006-12-26T20:37:00.000-05:002006-12-26T20:37:00.000-05:00The proximate cause is that CGM had no reason to f...The proximate cause is that CGM had no reason to fear any kind of punishment from society. Telling those lies to get out of going to jail is a no-brainer, especially one with no values.<br /><br />Am I right, JC?<br /><br />the duderAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-37942198486933462832006-12-26T19:38:00.000-05:002006-12-26T19:38:00.000-05:00Let's have a Socratic dialogue.
What's the proxim...Let's have a Socratic dialogue.<br /><br />What's the proximate (ie, legal) cause for Precious's lie?<br /><br />Let's subtitle this: How KC Johnson screwed up his FP interview<br /><br />jcAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-14811131937484371702006-12-26T18:34:00.000-05:002006-12-26T18:34:00.000-05:00Thank you for posting the transcript. I did not me...Thank you for posting the transcript. I did not mean to suggest that the excerpts were misquoted, and I apologize for the hectoring tone of my post. I only meant that it is a bit frustrating to see people quoting from a transcript which is not reasonably available to others. Your hard work is appreciated.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-11559345350108666052006-12-26T18:31:00.000-05:002006-12-26T18:31:00.000-05:00she's probably a lot fatter nowshe's probably a lot fatter nowAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-63593477504730100642006-12-26T16:05:00.000-05:002006-12-26T16:05:00.000-05:00yawwwwzaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
she hot
dark an...yawwwwzaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa<br /><br />she hot<br /><br />dark and ugly--and chubby<br /><br />i gettin a chubby thinkin bout her<br /><br />she UGLAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-91725241070938299342006-12-26T15:50:00.000-05:002006-12-26T15:50:00.000-05:00have a link for pictures?
can't find themhave a link for pictures?<br /><br />can't find themAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-73952755347677557892006-12-26T15:41:00.000-05:002006-12-26T15:41:00.000-05:00Thers a picture of precious on the liestopper dicu...Thers a picture of precious on the liestopper dicussion board. She looks like cousin Jackie.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-52523612473773958762006-12-26T15:10:00.000-05:002006-12-26T15:10:00.000-05:00JC brought a legitimate complaint against Mr Johns...JC brought a legitimate complaint against Mr Johnson. Why do other posters feel the need to "defend" him? The issues this case addresses--prosecutorial misconduct; incompetent university management; society's failure to protect men from vicious liars; no academic standards for black professors--are far more important than this case itself.<br /><br />I applaud JC for his courage, even though he's a bit of an ass.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-70492707050031311212006-12-26T14:04:00.000-05:002006-12-26T14:04:00.000-05:00BA,
have a meeting
i'll get back to u re preciou...BA,<br /><br />have a meeting<br /><br />i'll get back to u re precious--this is most troubling<br /><br />jcAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-25698870168208129842006-12-26T13:37:00.000-05:002006-12-26T13:37:00.000-05:00KC~thanks for the link to the court transcript. I...KC~thanks for the link to the court transcript. It was not quite as good as actually being there to see Dr. Meehan and Nifong squirm must have been, but almost.<br /><br />It seems that Nifong continued his jabs at the defense attorneys when trying to set a date for the next hearing. He rude comment about finding a date for the large number of defense attorneys meant that he might not be alive by the time they could all agree on a common one--that was just so typical of his unprofessional courtroom behavior in this case!<br /><br />I did enjoy reading his pathetic attempts to object to some of the questioning--the judge overruled him almost every time! I have some hope for this judge!<br /><br />duke2009momAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-75239744093366140392006-12-26T13:29:00.000-05:002006-12-26T13:29:00.000-05:0012:45 and 1:00
Get a handle on yourself. KC is wha...12:45 and 1:00<br />Get a handle on yourself. KC is what he is! it seems to most of us that he is Very Good at what he has been doing with Durham in Wonderland. Singlehandedly taking down nifong for the twit he is. <br /><br />Nifong relies on Precious. Which one has less brain cells, if any? <br />Prescious was raped by three people who did not wear condoms. At least one ejaculated in her mouth. Now she can't recall if the object that ejaculated was a Penis or a foreign object(ala wrestling).<br />Who is "less smart"? The mother of two, with 5 men's DNA on her who doesn't know what a Penis looks like OR the moron DA who believes her.The Dudehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07417776000068927222noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-57792742456179180972006-12-26T13:27:00.000-05:002006-12-26T13:27:00.000-05:00Gotta defend K.C., although he does a good enough ...Gotta defend K.C., although he does a good enough job himself. The "rape shield" laws were used because the standard defense in any rape case was "she was asking for it," no matter what the situation.<br /><br />Unfortunately, rape shield laws often have been used to eliminate real live exculpatory evidence. Fong was hoping to do the same here, and no doubt he would have tried to throw out the fact that she had DNA traces of a number of men in her underwear and, well, elsewhere. And I have no doubt that Wendy Murphy would have supported that.<br /><br />The real legal issue is whether or not rape is a crime against an individual or a crime against WOMEN. In the first instance, it is a crime as has been historically understood in U.S. law. The second instance makes it a political crime.<br /><br />Estrich is caught somewhere between the two. K.C. holds it to be the former, and Wendy Murphy has gone whole hog to the latter, as did the Gang of 88.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-90737261214646384342006-12-26T13:00:00.000-05:002006-12-26T13:00:00.000-05:00I read the FP article, and I agree that Professor ...I read the FP article, and I agree that Professor Johnson gives the impression that there is nothing wrong with the rape laws. I was also bothered by his reference to Susan Estrich, because Estrich would never want to put CGM in prison.<br /><br />KC Johnson is best at regurgitating facts, not creative analysis.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-7279673598831098332006-12-26T12:45:00.000-05:002006-12-26T12:45:00.000-05:00KC Johnson really screwed up in his FrontPage inte...KC Johnson really screwed up in his FrontPage interview:<br /><br />Glazov asked him about rape laws, and he spouted the same old BS.<br /><br />KC, y didn't u mention changing the laws to accommodate the "needs" of predators like Precious? i gave u all the arguments--r u turning into a manly man?--jeezzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz<br /><br />major Fup, buddy<br /><br />jcAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-45959151756140389282006-12-26T12:33:00.000-05:002006-12-26T12:33:00.000-05:00has anyone noticed that the euphemism for stupid, ...has anyone noticed that the euphemism for stupid, tenured blacks at duke is "leftist"?<br /><br />i feel sorry for the intelligent leftists<br /><br />jcAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-26261821466095801902006-12-26T12:14:00.000-05:002006-12-26T12:14:00.000-05:00what's gonzales's phone # at DOJ?
jcwhat's gonzales's phone # at DOJ?<br /><br />jcAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-41962466795595993842006-12-26T12:06:00.000-05:002006-12-26T12:06:00.000-05:00The Meehan Transcript page 91 shows the following ...The Meehan Transcript page 91 shows the following question from Nifong and answer by Meehan:<br /><br />Q.<br />Did anybody ever tell you who you were supposed to come up with results of? Who we wanted you to pick?<br />A.<br />No. No. That's . . . Yeah.<br /><br />Yeah means YES! This is a clear, direct answer from Meehan that someone did tell him who he was supposed to come up with results of, who Nifong wanted him to pick out. Why did the defense not jump all over this?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-82962683489983228712006-12-26T12:03:00.000-05:002006-12-26T12:03:00.000-05:00Anonymous 7:57/8:00
Your comment calling KC "a sel...Anonymous 7:57/8:00<br />Your comment calling KC "a self-proclaimed "historian""<br /><br />What would you "proclaim" a Harvard trained Professor of History?<br />A Plumber?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com