tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post5167512218209271934..comments2024-02-24T05:19:10.949-05:00Comments on Durham-in-Wonderland: Wilson v. Bradleykcjohnson9http://www.blogger.com/profile/09625813296986996867noreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-50042975110267755652007-08-19T01:20:00.000-04:002007-08-19T01:20:00.000-04:00Thanks for interesting article.Thanks for interesting article.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-64039341019811916782006-10-20T08:11:00.000-04:002006-10-20T08:11:00.000-04:00re: 10:46 comment--Very good point!! There are a ...re: 10:46 comment--Very good point!! There are a few very loose ends that keep getting forgotten but could be very important, and the source of the mystery email is at the top of the list (another is the AV's missing money and shoe.)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-49178761042174078632006-10-20T01:15:00.000-04:002006-10-20T01:15:00.000-04:00There is no such thing as "deleting" an email anym...There is no such thing as "deleting" an email anymore. Stuff you trashed ages ago can be found through high tech searches. I have seen many legal cases where emails were key. Methods are very sophisticated and thorough. Of course, if you spend all day writing a term paper and it is lost in a computer crash, it's gone forever. ;-DAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-37773267843949131772006-10-19T22:46:00.000-04:002006-10-19T22:46:00.000-04:00KC: Nifong's and the DPD lies and deception have ...KC: Nifong's and the DPD lies and deception have been revealed. Yet something still has not been investigated or even questioned by the press. Who sent that e-mail from the players computer, saying he was going to go to the police and tell all. At the time the Durham police were all over the dorms, sticking their feet in the doors to get in. Duke security were giving them free access as well. The police were questioning kids. And then this e-mail is sent to other players. The student whose computer it was sent from was in class at the time. If the DPD snuck into his room without a warrant and sent an email pretending to be someone else, isn't this criminal beahvior. This was the time Nifong was trying to play head games with the team and coerce a confession from one of the players. Then he went on t.v. talking about a "wall of silence". Can they check the time the email was sent and check survailance cameras around the dorms. I wouldn't be surprised if this computer was confiscated by the DPD and the email was erased to cover their tracks. This loose thread really bothers me.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-25365891577108606502006-10-19T21:49:00.000-04:002006-10-19T21:49:00.000-04:00Don't waste time sending complaints to Duff Wilson...Don't waste time sending complaints to Duff Wilson or the editor or the so-called public editor or the publisher. Send your complaints and comments to the family members of the Board of Directors of The New York Times Co.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-11099677980054187132006-10-19T17:45:00.000-04:002006-10-19T17:45:00.000-04:00On another board, Cash also said that Victoria Pet...On another board, Cash also said that Victoria Peterson should have been interviewed...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-42441365866639326192006-10-19T17:40:00.000-04:002006-10-19T17:40:00.000-04:00In case you are unaware KC - Cash is responding di...In case you are unaware KC - Cash is responding directly to questions on Talk Left. check it out.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-7735973987291371152006-10-19T16:17:00.000-04:002006-10-19T16:17:00.000-04:00I'm planning a lengthier comment on the Michaels a...I'm planning a lengthier comment on the Michaels article tomorrow.<br /><br />A quick reply for the moment. I can see where he could criticize 60 Mins for, say, not putting on Joyner, but disagree with his conclusions.<br /><br />The Joyner/McSurely line has consistently been: "Wait till the trial, there must be something in the file."<br /><br />CBS looked at the file. From the content of its report, it clearly found nothing there. So it would be pretty irresponsible journalism to put on someone to say something that CBS has established, through its own reporting, to be untrue.kcjohnson9https://www.blogger.com/profile/09625813296986996867noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-57593732151276598192006-10-19T16:15:00.000-04:002006-10-19T16:15:00.000-04:00This comment has been removed by the author.kcjohnson9https://www.blogger.com/profile/09625813296986996867noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-29506257422634458882006-10-19T15:11:00.000-04:002006-10-19T15:11:00.000-04:00kc: great point. i personally wouldn't hold my bre...kc: great point. i personally wouldn't hold my breath. time and again, we have seen the msm deny any duty to correct or retract in their earlier pronouncements and inaccurate reporting. <br /><br />in a related story - our friend, cash, is back on the scene. this time, he is taking a position i find pretty interesting:<br /><br /><a href="http://wilmingtonjournal.blackpressusa.com/News/Article/Article.asp?NewsID=73330&sID=4">DUKE ALLEGED RAPE CASE: HOW '60 MINUTES' FAILED THE FAIRNESS TEST'', WEEK OF OCTOBER 19-25, 2006</a><br /><br />most interesting to me is his characterization of the cbs spokesman. he definitely wants us to believe that there is some hidden story there, that 60 minutes was trying to hide the other side. no, they did not include joyner - maybe that would have been an interesting person to have on. however, equating joyner with coleman is simply inaccurate. coleman is not being put on as a black man, a professor, or a person with interest in the community. he was put on primarily due to his chairing of the committee that looked specifically into this matter on duke campus and issued the report in june - so ignored by broadhead and the community. however, like i said, i believe it would have been interesting to hear joyner have to actually articulate factual answers to some of bradley's questions. so far, michaels and joyner have only done the "there is hidden discovery" and "just wait until you see all of the great important evidence" dances, without any substantiation to back these theories up. of course, neither even pretends to care that nifong should NOT be withholding such crucial, devastating evidence - especially not at this stage - but no matter.<br /><br />kc: thoughts?Daddyx4https://www.blogger.com/profile/17394221481565818109noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-32068601275685555722006-10-19T15:07:00.000-04:002006-10-19T15:07:00.000-04:00This comment has been removed by the author.Daddyx4https://www.blogger.com/profile/17394221481565818109noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-20626231674832528592006-10-19T14:16:00.000-04:002006-10-19T14:16:00.000-04:00Once again, a great post. Will the Times make a c...Once again, a great post. Will the Times make a correction? Quite unlikely! Ironically I find that the blogs focusing on the Duke fiasco are more than willing to make corrections when there are factual mistakes. A segment of the mainstream media seems to think that they are infallible. Their cover up is worse than the initial mistake.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com