tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post6510383943469724798..comments2024-02-24T05:19:10.949-05:00Comments on Durham-in-Wonderland: Haagen Quotekcjohnson9http://www.blogger.com/profile/09625813296986996867noreply@blogger.comBlogger67125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-67057462743699592832007-04-11T14:47:00.000-04:002007-04-11T14:47:00.000-04:00YESSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!ObserverYESSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<BR/><BR/>ObserverAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-36091872066244810882007-04-11T14:38:00.000-04:002007-04-11T14:38:00.000-04:00FREE AT LAST!FREE AT LAST!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-87558487277795602092007-04-11T14:23:00.000-04:002007-04-11T14:23:00.000-04:00Insuficiently Sensitive,Thanks for the correction....Insuficiently Sensitive,<BR/><BR/>Thanks for the correction.<BR/>I'm not absolutely positive<BR/>what race "Justeece" is -<BR/>but it doesn't matter:<BR/>their comments were designed<BR/>to upset people who've had<BR/>their eye on this injustice<BR/>for such a long time.<BR/><BR/>Here's how a lefty from the<BR/>NYTimes operates:<BR/>Argue points 1-10, point-by-<BR/>point, dissembling the <BR/>lefty's arguments - (such as<BR/>those by the thoroughly <BR/>rancid Claire Potter.) After<BR/>making the 10th point, <BR/>the lefty says:<BR/><BR/> "Yeah, but what about...<BR/>(point # 1?)" As if it <BR/>hadn't been dismissed.<BR/><BR/>This is what they attempt <BR/>every time they send a dupe<BR/>to make a comment like that,<BR/>if only because it's so <BR/>infuriating. My advice is to<BR/>avoid rising to the bait, <BR/>and to cooly dispatch them<BR/>if it is possible.<BR/><BR/>Their goal, since they can't<BR/>win, is to make us:<BR/>1) angry with each other<BR/>2) jump to issues that aren't <BR/>related to the issue at hand.<BR/><BR/>I hope people can see when they're <BR/>being baited, and respond <BR/>accordingly.<BR/><BR/>MacAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-57185303351567149862007-04-11T14:10:00.000-04:002007-04-11T14:10:00.000-04:00Way to go justeece, we are all forgetting the rape...Way to go justeece, we are all forgetting the rape victim.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-24310577520518025912007-04-11T14:04:00.000-04:002007-04-11T14:04:00.000-04:00Why on earth would someone listen to a Duke law pr...Why on earth would someone listen to a Duke law professor prattling on what's good for the community? That's like listening to phlegm give a lecture on sanitation.seanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14541872630011468807noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-62939216149060445962007-04-11T13:44:00.000-04:002007-04-11T13:44:00.000-04:00Anyone know if there will be A LYING WHORE CAM at ...Anyone know if there will be A LYING WHORE CAM at Precios panties house?<BR/><BR/>PolanskiAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-83135272797556369002007-04-11T13:38:00.000-04:002007-04-11T13:38:00.000-04:00Mac - you nailed it, I'm wrong, and I apologise.No...Mac - you nailed it, I'm wrong, and I apologise.<BR/><BR/>Note to self: think first, then blather.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-63220886657286915952007-04-11T13:26:00.000-04:002007-04-11T13:26:00.000-04:00KC's take on the Haagen 'helmet sports' comment:Ma...KC's take on the Haagen 'helmet sports' comment:<BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://durhamwonderland.blogspot.com/2006/11/green-light-for-nifong.html" REL="nofollow"><B>March 25</B></A><BR/><BR/><I>The day opened with the N&O’s front-page story on the incident, featuring an interview with the “victim.” The article has been widely, and properly, discredited, but at the time it had enormous impact.<BR/><BR/>From the Duke angle, the article contained a stunning item. The piece concluded with remarks from Paul Haagen, chairman of Duke’s Academic Council, who said that violence against women was more prevalent among males who play “helmet” sports, such as football, hockey, and lacrosse. “These are sports of violence,” he said. “This is clearly a concern.”<BR/><BR/>As John in Carolina has pointed out, Haagen’s words, whether he intended them to do so or not, explained “to readers why the Duke students might have committed the violent acts of which they are accused in the story.”</I>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-77631257439705058692007-04-11T13:20:00.000-04:002007-04-11T13:20:00.000-04:0011:38am Anongprestonian, would you refresh my memo...<B>11:38am Anon</B><BR/><BR/><I>gprestonian, would you refresh my memory on Haagen's "helmet sports" comment? What exactly it was and when and where it was made. Thanks. </I><BR/><BR/>Sure 11:38, glad to. Haagen's comment concluded the infamous Mar 25 N&O hit piece that ignited this bonfire of the vanities:<BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://www.newsobserver.com/1185/story/421799.html" REL="nofollow"><B>Dancer gives details of ordeal</B></A><BR/><BR/>(found via a Technorati search on KC's blog - GREAT way to find out who the players are and what they said [and what KC thought about it] :)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-16349430437471719172007-04-11T13:19:00.001-04:002007-04-11T13:19:00.001-04:00I posted the following several weeks ago:"This bri...I posted the following several weeks ago:<BR/><BR/>"This brings us back to the concept of the state serving the "greater good" - in this case, the NC Bar making a deal with Nifong so he won't spill -their- guts; get out of jail free."<BR/><BR/>Continuing; "This scenario does not bode well for the accused, not that the false charges will stand, but that they'll be dismissed under a calculated cloud of suspicion (i.e., guilt) - under the DA doctrine of, "Well, 'something' happened."Davidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11455115946266214907noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-68094585025362576432007-04-11T13:19:00.000-04:002007-04-11T13:19:00.000-04:00Minorities are given a leg up in admissions to the...Minorities are given a leg up in admissions to the most prestigious schools and find themselves competing against students who actually deserve to be there.<BR/><BR/>The resultant is that these afirmative action students tend to find themselves clustered in areas where intellectual rigor is less demanding. I.e. AAS.<BR/><BR/>That said, Im not sure I would agree with dismantling Black studies altogether. I'm sure there is a place for the discipline alongside many of the other humanities.<BR/><BR/>My own recommendations lie more towards hiring as professors only the brightest for this narrow field. Consider this, how many paying jobs are there for concert pianists? Very few, and only the absolute best are lucky enough to have such a position. I believe AAS should be similarly demanding as the field really is so narrow and is undeserving of the current over funding.<BR/><BR/>Hiring a better faculty for AAS has merit. The intent would be to produce an actual worthwhile educational experience vice what we see today which is really nothing more than the scholatic equivalent of a dumping ground for under prepared students.<BR/><BR/>Does MIT really need an AAS program to produce well trained engineers? No, indeed that particular college is nothing more than a tax on the rest of the institution. Many Universities are in a similar circumstance. <BR/><BR/><BR/>The current trend in AAS is a faculty that definately doesnt have the intellectual capacity to produce a worthwhile program. They seem to be more the "Couldnt get a job doing anything else" sort.<BR/><BR/><BR/>The jibberish of the writings published by the AAS faculty just astounds me. It is painful to read and serves no purpose.<BR/><BR/>I'll say it again, the current state of AAS today is nothing more than a tax levied against the university system and the AAS professors little more than the beneficiaries of institutional welfare.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-54950525439130136832007-04-11T13:06:00.000-04:002007-04-11T13:06:00.000-04:00Defense Attorney Wade Smith, in a video clip on WR...Defense Attorney Wade Smith, in a video clip on WRAL.com, says that the AG's investigatoon has looked "under very rock...my goodness, they looked at things that we didnt even think to look at."<BR/><BR/>Sounds encouraging -- I hope it's all made public in a report.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-26650443320095886642007-04-11T13:01:00.000-04:002007-04-11T13:01:00.000-04:00Jamil,If Angry Studies is getting stronger every d...Jamil,<BR/><BR/>If Angry Studies is getting stronger every day, then it would be logical to conclude that its principal beneficiaries are getting stronger.<BR/><BR/>HEH, DUKIES:<BR/><BR/>ANYONE HAVE A LOW-IQ CAM? WE CAN DOCUMENT WAHNEEMA'S MOVEMENTS, MARVELING AT HOW MUCH STRONGER SHE IS GETTING!<BR/><BR/>Jamil, by "stronger" are you alluding to BO or farts?<BR/><BR/>PolanskiAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-19618570390734424582007-04-11T12:53:00.000-04:002007-04-11T12:53:00.000-04:00Let's see.1. the dismantling of Angry StudiesAngry...Let's see.<BR/><BR/><I>1. the dismantling of Angry Studies</I><BR/><BR/>Angry Studies has just been elevated to departmental status.<BR/>I would also expect dept of homosexual studies to be established in 2007.<BR/><BR/><I>2. the end of affirmative action</I><BR/><BR/>Democratic congress is proposing tougher AA measures in the name of "equality" and "diversity".<BR/><BR/><I>3. felony raps for lying whores</I><BR/><BR/>New congress is pushing various equality and gender bills that would make it easier <BR/>to report baseless rape reports and get away with it. "Her word against his" is enough evidence.<BR/><BR/><I>4. firing stupid racist "professors"</I><BR/><BR/>Nobody has been fired (except white coach, and couple of white students). it is more likely that Elvis is alive than to believe any of the racist Gang88 members will be fired.<BR/><BR/><BR/><I>5. suing the shit out of Durham, Duke, Crystal Gail Mangum--and Mike (the bitch) Nifong</I><BR/><BR/>This is beyond the control of the Democratic party, so this will happen. However, if Durham jury is involved, the result is surely in favour of gang88.<BR/><BR/><I>6. firing Richard Brodhead, the his bitchees</I><BR/><BR/>Maybe in some alternative universe..Brodhead will probably get a job as a Princeton president or secretary of education (in 2009).<BR/><BR/>Dream on. The war has been lost, even if this battle is won. Angry Studies gets stronger every day, not weaker.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-41371355632949940812007-04-11T12:42:00.000-04:002007-04-11T12:42:00.000-04:00I have to agree--"Justeece" is probably a "provoca...<I>I have to agree--"Justeece" is probably a "provocateur" and either KKK or White Power </I><BR/><BR/>It is quite clear she or he is black activist of some sort, working for New York al-Times, Black Panthers, Gang88, Jesse Jackson or some other professional racist organisation.<BR/><BR/>This is the crap gang88 has been touting since the beginning.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-1442020356050009632007-04-11T12:38:00.000-04:002007-04-11T12:38:00.000-04:00Insufficiently sensitive:I'm not for what 11:43 sa...Insufficiently sensitive:<BR/><BR/>I'm not for what 11:43 said:<BR/>you are confusing me with him<BR/>(or her.) Perhaps you need to<BR/>re-read my comments?<BR/>11:43 appears to be a <BR/>provocateur, perhaps, <BR/>as you suggested, <BR/>from the New York Times, <BR/>maybe not even someone from <BR/>the AA community itself -<BR/>(unless it was one of the 88s,<BR/>which would explain the misspellings.) <BR/><BR/><BR/>Re-read the threads, <BR/>and please don't confuse <BR/>me with the author of that <BR/>vile crap: you and I are <BR/>making the same point. <BR/><BR/>Thank you.<BR/><BR/>MacAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-11770852774869360312007-04-11T12:37:00.000-04:002007-04-11T12:37:00.000-04:00I have to agree--"Justeece" is probably a "provoca...I have to agree--"Justeece" is probably a "provocateur" and either KKK or White Power connected. We will be hearing much talk in the black community about the "white conspiracy" and how the rich and powerful white people always take advantage of the poor black people, but I think "Justeece" is a lurking KKK....Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-6454734660483413012007-04-11T12:30:00.000-04:002007-04-11T12:30:00.000-04:00THE CASE IS FINALLY BEGINNINGNow it's time to addr...THE CASE IS FINALLY BEGINNING<BR/><BR/>Now it's time to address:<BR/><BR/>1. the dismantling of Angry Studies<BR/>2. the end of affirmative action<BR/>3. felony raps for lying whores<BR/>4. firing stupid racist "professors"<BR/>5. suing the shit out of Durham, Duke, Crystal Gail Mangum--and Mike (the bitch) Nifong<BR/>6. firing Richard Brodhead, the his bitchees<BR/><BR/>PolanskiAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-32910545126857988622007-04-11T12:29:00.000-04:002007-04-11T12:29:00.000-04:00...please don't feed the trolls......please don't feed the trolls...AMachttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08872008617279528583noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-81777655554600416782007-04-11T12:21:00.001-04:002007-04-11T12:21:00.001-04:00When the Democrat AG says the case was really flaw...When the Democrat AG says the case was really flawed right from jumpstreet, the media will say, in their best Gomer Pyle voice, "Gah-ah-LEE. Shazam!" Bloggers figured this to be a railroad job about thirty seconds after Knife-ong started flapping his gums well over a year ago! The Pajamahadeen wins again!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-64155583415269036062007-04-11T12:21:00.000-04:002007-04-11T12:21:00.000-04:00Good call indeed, anonymous 10:04.The brief Duff W...Good call indeed, anonymous 10:04.<BR/><BR/>The brief Duff Wilson article was subdued, and reminiscent of the old NYT that pretty much gave the sterile facts, but there was one thing I noticed.<BR/><BR/>He mentioned twice that the accuser changed her story, referring to her December version as if it was the only changed version, and he gave it particular significance, as if this change alone blew the case.<BR/><BR/>Looks like this is his official excuse for missing the mark so badly in August; there was a major development after the now infamous August front page piece.<BR/><BR/>The case was a farce long before Precious gave yet another version in December, and Wilson was too stupid/biased/pressured to know it and report it in August.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-79273436391583425882007-04-11T12:18:00.000-04:002007-04-11T12:18:00.000-04:00And I'm fairly sure that Mac is from the New York ...And I'm fairly sure that Mac is from the New York Times and is waving his provocation rag around in hopes of some savage retorts for the Times to slice and dice and print as examples of our refined discussions.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-38738518052046409762007-04-11T12:14:00.000-04:002007-04-11T12:14:00.000-04:00I just hope that the boys and their families can g...I just hope that the boys and their families can get justice. A significant portion of their lives were taken from them, and their prospects for significant future employment are diminished, and God only knows what this has done to their families finances.<BR/><BR/>I am torn as to what should be done with the false accuser. I would hate to see anything done that would disuade any 'real' victim of sexual assualt or rape from coming forward. I think she has done alot of damage.<BR/><BR/>I think that the university administrators, and the faculty, that hung these boys out to dry are evildoers, but I am not optimistic that the boys and their families will get just compensation.<BR/><BR/>Joe KAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-8770554267280961212007-04-11T12:11:00.000-04:002007-04-11T12:11:00.000-04:00Another prediction about how the MSM will cover th...Another prediction about how the MSM will cover the AG's announcement:<BR/><BR/>Many news outlets will treat as stunning revelations the AG's recitation of some of the DPD's and DA's well-known procedural improprieties in conducting the investigation. By tomorrow morning, the talking heads will all be discussing how shocked, shocked they were to learn today that virtually all the key interviews with witnesses and Mangum were conducted one-on-one, without recording or a third party witness. Likewise, the pundits will treat as new information the AG's likely statement that the lineup was both inadmissible and logically flawed.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32542246.post-68012634484559785432007-04-11T12:07:00.000-04:002007-04-11T12:07:00.000-04:0011:43I'm fairly certain that youare white, you kno...11:43<BR/><BR/>I'm fairly certain that you<BR/>are white, you know what we <BR/>ALL know - (that CGM was not <BR/>raped) - and I'm also fairly <BR/>certain that your main intent <BR/>is to inflame passions and <BR/>piss people off. <BR/><BR/>(Which branch of the KKK <BR/>did you say you represent?)<BR/><BR/>MacAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com