Comments and analysis about the Duke/Nifong case (2006-2014).
Thursday, June 21, 2007
Nifong: "I Don't Read Discovery Requests"
In this clip, Nifong admitted to Doug Brocker that he did not read defense discovery requests in the case, including a critical June request from Joe Cheshire.
Unbelievable. He doesn't bother to read discovery requests because he provides everything, but he also says that he did not provide key DNA evidence because it was supposedly non-probative. You can't have it both ways, Mike.
As it relates to the actual mechanics of running the Hoax case, do we know whether the Fongster did *anything* but give slanderous and unethical press conferences and obstruct justice?
I have been watching the clips as they have been posted by KC. Taken together they are more sinister than they would be as isolated events. One could plausibly believe ONE or TWO of the excuses. However, taken together, I can could is that he is a cynical liar and sociopath who got caught. I would bet he pulled this trick all along. His method appears to be "open file" but with critical items left out of the file.
Bad typing sorry ......I have been watching the clips as they have been posted by KC. Taken together they are more sinister than they would be as isolated events. One could plausibly believe ONE or TWO of the excuses. However, taken together, I can only conclude that he is a cynical liar and sociopath who got caught. I would bet he pulled this trick all along. His method appears to be "open file" but with critical items left out of the file.
It was all a ruse for future defense of insanity. He's just not remembering on purpose, making them continue to work for all the evidence to prove their positions. He doesn't care about anything but obfuscation for his own protection.
SO, which of the 20 or so ADAs did read the discovery motions? And they did what with that information?
ReplyDeleteBy the way. I just looked at the homepage of the Durham District Attorney....guess whose picture is still there?
ReplyDeleteUnbelievable. He doesn't bother to read discovery requests because he provides everything, but he also says that he did not provide key DNA evidence because it was supposedly non-probative. You can't have it both ways, Mike.
ReplyDeleteWhat a pompous, self-righteous, arrogant ass Nifong proved himself to be.
ReplyDeleteBet he reads the papers served on him as he becomes the target of legal action ...
Your right, Mr. Ugly is still up there on the website:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.ncdistrictattorney.org/mikenifong/your_district_attorney.htm
Get out the hook!! Pull this jackass off the stage.
ReplyDeleteAs it relates to the actual mechanics of running the Hoax case, do we know whether the Fongster did *anything* but give slanderous and unethical press conferences and obstruct justice?
ReplyDelete"I had complied with that request before I had received it".
ReplyDeleteLIES MIKEY!
How could you KNOW TO HAVE COMPLIED if you did not read it?
I have been watching the clips as they have been posted by KC. Taken together they are more sinister than they would be as isolated events. One could plausibly believe ONE or TWO of the excuses. However, taken together, I can could is that he is a cynical liar and sociopath who got caught. I would bet he pulled this trick all along. His method appears to be "open file" but with critical items left out of the file.
ReplyDeleteBad typing sorry ......I have been watching the clips as they have been posted by KC. Taken together they are more sinister than they would be as isolated events. One could plausibly believe ONE or TWO of the excuses. However, taken together, I can only conclude that he is a cynical liar and sociopath who got caught. I would bet he pulled this trick all along. His method appears to be "open file" but with critical items left out of the file.
ReplyDeleteThink about what Nifong defense was in this extremely visible case:
ReplyDeleteHe does not read evidence reports
He does not read motions
He does not read letters from defense lawyers.
He does not review evidence.
Just business as usual?
Memo to Mikey,
ReplyDeleteReading is fundamental - especially for DA's that are doing their jobs.
Mikey was just keeping an open mind. So open that the facts fell out of it.
ReplyDeleteA liberal for all times. Don't confuse 'em with facts.
It was all a ruse for future defense of insanity. He's just not remembering on purpose, making them continue to work for all the evidence to prove their positions.
ReplyDeleteHe doesn't care about anything but obfuscation for his own protection.
English Majors have an axiom
ReplyDelete(to grind?) that applies to
NoFang:
"If you can't blind 'em with brilliance,
baffle 'em with bullshit."
That's apparently the Motto
of the 88, as well.