Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Comments and analysis about the Duke/Nifong case (2006-2014).
(2) My clearing a comment implies neither that I agree nor that I disagree with the comment. My opinion is expressed in my words and my words only. Since this blog has more than 1500 posts, and since I at least occasionally comment myself, the blog provides more than enough material for readers to discern my opinions.
(3) If a reader finds an offensive comment, I urge the reader to e-mail me; if the comment is offensive, I will gladly delete it.
(4) Commenters who either misrepresent their identity or who engage in obvious troll behavior will not have their comments cleared. Troll-like behavior includes, but is not limited to: repeatedly linking to off-topic sites; repeatedly asking questions that already have been answered; offering unsubstantiated remarks whose sole purpose appears to be inflaming other commenters.
15 comments:
SO, which of the 20 or so ADAs did read the discovery motions? And they did what with that information?
By the way. I just looked at the homepage of the Durham District Attorney....guess whose picture is still there?
Unbelievable. He doesn't bother to read discovery requests because he provides everything, but he also says that he did not provide key DNA evidence because it was supposedly non-probative. You can't have it both ways, Mike.
What a pompous, self-righteous, arrogant ass Nifong proved himself to be.
Bet he reads the papers served on him as he becomes the target of legal action ...
Your right, Mr. Ugly is still up there on the website:
http://www.ncdistrictattorney.org/mikenifong/your_district_attorney.htm
Get out the hook!! Pull this jackass off the stage.
As it relates to the actual mechanics of running the Hoax case, do we know whether the Fongster did *anything* but give slanderous and unethical press conferences and obstruct justice?
"I had complied with that request before I had received it".
LIES MIKEY!
How could you KNOW TO HAVE COMPLIED if you did not read it?
I have been watching the clips as they have been posted by KC. Taken together they are more sinister than they would be as isolated events. One could plausibly believe ONE or TWO of the excuses. However, taken together, I can could is that he is a cynical liar and sociopath who got caught. I would bet he pulled this trick all along. His method appears to be "open file" but with critical items left out of the file.
Bad typing sorry ......I have been watching the clips as they have been posted by KC. Taken together they are more sinister than they would be as isolated events. One could plausibly believe ONE or TWO of the excuses. However, taken together, I can only conclude that he is a cynical liar and sociopath who got caught. I would bet he pulled this trick all along. His method appears to be "open file" but with critical items left out of the file.
Think about what Nifong defense was in this extremely visible case:
He does not read evidence reports
He does not read motions
He does not read letters from defense lawyers.
He does not review evidence.
Just business as usual?
Memo to Mikey,
Reading is fundamental - especially for DA's that are doing their jobs.
Mikey was just keeping an open mind. So open that the facts fell out of it.
A liberal for all times. Don't confuse 'em with facts.
It was all a ruse for future defense of insanity. He's just not remembering on purpose, making them continue to work for all the evidence to prove their positions.
He doesn't care about anything but obfuscation for his own protection.
English Majors have an axiom
(to grind?) that applies to
NoFang:
"If you can't blind 'em with brilliance,
baffle 'em with bullshit."
That's apparently the Motto
of the 88, as well.
Post a Comment