Comments and analysis about the Duke/Nifong case (2006-2014).
After court, Nifong amended his remarks and said he knew about the DNA results.
"And we were trying to, just as Dr. Meehan said, trying to avoid dragging any names through the mud but at the same time his report made it clear that all the information was available if they wanted it and they have every word of it," Nifong said.
(2) My clearing a comment implies neither that I agree nor that I disagree with the comment. My opinion is expressed in my words and my words only. Since this blog has more than 1500 posts, and since I at least occasionally comment myself, the blog provides more than enough material for readers to discern my opinions.
(3) If a reader finds an offensive comment, I urge the reader to e-mail me; if the comment is offensive, I will gladly delete it.
(4) Commenters who either misrepresent their identity or who engage in obvious troll behavior will not have their comments cleared. Troll-like behavior includes, but is not limited to: repeatedly linking to off-topic sites; repeatedly asking questions that already have been answered; offering unsubstantiated remarks whose sole purpose appears to be inflaming other commenters.
5 comments:
How dare you impune the integrity of this wonderful, Christian prosecutor!
How dare you . . . is right!
Day late and a dollar short to drag them through the mud (Dec 15th). They'd been convicted in the media for six plus months. The exculpatory evidence had been known most of that time. Nifong needed time and hoped that the media would "forget" so he could wiggle out.
All 3 players are in court today.
http://www.wral.com/news/video/1506159/
Post a Comment